Saturday, July 04, 2009

Cynthia McKinney's Credibility Under Attack

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Daryl Bradford Smith's website iamthewitness.com is presently as of this writing linking to two articles which attack Cynthia McKinney's credibility. I again urge someone who knows McKinney to inform her of these facts. These links appear as:

GENUINE OPPOSITION CAMPAIGN UPDATE

which states, among other things,

"Any intelligent reading of the situation will reveal that the Palestinians are, in actuality, worse off than they were before. Because, while the 'alternative' media focused attention on McKinney's standoff with the Israeli navy, the Israeli government announced the largest seizure of Palestinian land in more than 40 years -- a development of far, far greater consequence to the Palestinian people than whether or not a small consignment of humanitarian aid got into Gaza.

Cynthia, though, made out just fine: although she failed in her mission to Gaza, she has reaped considerable 'street cred,' or popular credibility, within the growing anti-Zionist movement -- without once publicly conceding any of the movement's core grievances. [***] The 'Free Gaza' campaign is theatre."

iamthewitness.com is also presently linking to the following website as of this writing:

GENUINE OPPOSITION: CAMPAIGN UPDATE 2

which states, among other things,

"The Cynthia McKinney-led 'Free Gaza' campaign was meant to direct our resources in support of a side-issue, while the real threats -- Zionist infiltration of national governments and Israeli false-flag terrorism, among others -- go unmentioned.

For us, that just won't fly. Not this time.

As for those accusing us of being Zionist saboteurs intent on distracting attention away from the 'Free Gaza' affair, I say this: . . ."

In Rejoinder to "Judenfrei"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

"Judenfrei" again opens its attack on me with contradictory claims. On the one hand, "Judenfrei" argues that I have deliberately sabotaged my own book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein with valid arguments that Einstein was a racist and that Jews have always been a racist people; while on the other hand, "Judenfrei" declares that it espouses the views of Eric Hufschmid because they are supposedly legitimate and cares not what anyone thinks of that; and "Judenfrei" declares that Hufschmid could not taint my work by immediately promoting a bogus story on the heels of interviewing me about my book. I, in contradiction to "Judenfrei", am consistent. I tell the full truth about Einstein and am prepared and fully able to defend that truth. Unlike Eric Hufschmid, I have not promoted a hoax. My book on Einstein has been downloaded by hundreds of thousands of readers and received vast attention across the internet. "Judenfrei's" contention that I have somehow made a mistake by presenting a thorough and scholarly account of Einstein's plagiarism and his racism is thereby proven false. In addition, "Judenfrei" discounts the fact that I have published two books and various articles on Einstein's plagiarism, which do not address his racism. Was this also a supposed "trick"?

In respect to the Holocaust, "Judenfrei" has failed to quote where I have stated that the "Holocaust narrative" as defined by "Judenfrei" is true. Instead, "Judenfrei" agrees with what I have said in that "Judenfrei" agrees that European Jewry has been displaced.

Rather than argue with "Judenfrei" over the issue of 9/11 and its importance to exposing the crimes of World Jewry, I welcome the opportunity to discuss the facts regarding the Jewish involvement in 9/11 with someone who has proven themselves knowledgeable and credible on the issue and in general. I in no way seek to cover up the facts regarding the Jewish involvement in 9/11 or the crime in general. I have not addressed it in detail because I have not specialized in this area and do not wish to be associated with the nonsense of Hufschmid, Smith and Jones. I do agree that the facts should be broadly known to all and I agree to facilitate the exposure of these facts by credible means. If "Judenfrei" can facilitate such an opportunity, I would be grateful.

Contrary to "Judenfrei's" contentions, the central issue driving Christian Zionism is Jewish money and the Jewish corruption of Christianity, not the issue of the Khazarian origin of Ostjuden. The Khazarian Jews never had any legitimate claims on Palestine, but nor did or do the Berber or Arab Jews, nor did the Babylonian "Israelites" ever exist, nor did the Babylonian Judeans, by their own admissions, have any claim on the lands in which they were, by their own accounts, "strangers". Giving primary or even secondary importance to the Khazarian question is misrepresentation by omission of the Berber, Arab and Babylonian question, which hold no appeal to Christian Zionist who hold the Jewish Torah to be the written word of their Jewish god. However, quoting that god in the form of Jesus, and quoting the Jews on their hatred of Jesus has been a proven means of shaking Christian support for Jews who would and have subverted Christianity. "Judenfrei" fails to provide any examples where its approach has proven successful, let alone more successful than mine.

"Judenfrei" has understandably misunderstood what occurred between Hufschmid, Smith and me. Smith was booted off of GCN, for, by his accounts, my having raised the issue of Chabad Lubavitch on his show. I suspect it had more to do with his critiques of Alex Jones, but this is unimportant. I suggested to Smith that we start a network including him and Hufschmid, and that the shows we presented be distinct. In this way, should one of us be discredited, the others would not be a part of that specific show. In this way, undiluted points of view could be presented and a broader audience could have been reached. Smith and Hufschmid have misrepresented this fact as if I were trying to drive a wedge between Hufschmid and Smith, when in fact I was trying to create a network to compete with GCN and RBN. Smith wanted to make a certain "Nina" a part of this network and tried to interest me in her, but I found her of no interest. I did indeed first warn Hufschmid that the Sam Danner story was not credible and I then warned Smith that those who aligned themselves with this story would be discredited. "Judenfrei" wonders why someone would be discredited for promoting Sam Danner's story, and for having been interviewed by someone who promoted Sam Danner's story, but "Judenfrei" need only look to the arguments of Hufschmid himself for an answer.

"Judenfrei" fails to understand the natural defenses normal human beings have against the Jews. The stereotypical Jewish phenotype is repulsive to Northern Europeans, who depicted such persons as devils throughout the history of European art. The Christians have always viewed Jews as guilty of deicide. Europeans have always waged campaigns against the aggressive Jews, and until very recently kept the Jews locked away in Ghettoes. There is no sympathy for the Jew, other than in the mad eyes of deluded Christian Zionists, and Rev. Hagee has brought an end to much of that support. The World hates the Jews and always has, because the Jews have always hated the Goyim. The Zionist[s] at "Judenfrei" parrot the same dogma as the Zionists of old, that Jews can be cured of their mental diseases by segregation and nationhood. Just like their Zionist predecessors, "Judenfrei" advocate the segregation and nationhood of the Jews, which has already proven disastrous in the modern world. The Zionists of old lied to us and claimed that the Jews would be cured of their mental disease should a Jewish State be formed somewhere, anywhere. "Judenfrei" repeats this proven false contention. The Jews of Israel are even sicker and more perverted than their predecessors in Europe, America and Asia. "Judenfrei" promotes disproven Zionist theories, while criticizing me for proposing effective solutions. Other than from Zionist "Judenfrei" I am not aware of any criticism of my proposals. "Judenfrei's" arguments echo Herzl's arguments.

"Judenfrei" claims that my proposals mirror the Jewish doctrine of exterminating the human race. "Judenfrei" does not offer any evidence to support such a false claim. Rather, unlike the Jewish aggressor, I propose we solve the issue of Jewish aggression once and for all times. There is no equivalence between the defense from aggressive attack and that aggressive attack. There is no equivalence between the promotion of noble human cultures and people, and the promotion of subversive and perverse Jewish culture and people.

My questions are not answered in the "Monetary Reform Act" promoted by "Judenfrei", though "Judenfrei" claims they have been. Nor have I yet asked all of my questions. Does this reform act propose that the debts of the US be paid in full on a full term basis or prorated, or without any interest at all? Will a bond holder redeem his bonds at full value within one year from the passage of the act, or at a prorated rate, or simply recover his initial investment? I still await proof of any kind that Americans will deposit enough money in banks to cover the 100% deposit requirement made by the act for existing loans, let alone enough to cover the needed loan capital to sustain and grow our economy. "Judenfrei" may be oblivious to these flaws and omissions, but I am not.

Simply producing currency does not create growth. It instead creates inflation, there being more dollars chasing the same goods and services. Loan capital is a very different animal from money supply, though there can be not sufficient loan capital without sufficient money supply in one currency or another, and/or fractional reserve banking. This is why I fault the Utopian proposals which "Judenfrei" advocates. There needs to be addressed how loan capital will be provided and directed at growing the middle class and the economy. Gottfried Feder, for but one example, focused on the real economic necessities of building a viable economy, as opposed to Carmack's proposals, which appear only to profit the rich at the expense of the taxpayer. Paying off the debt to the debt holders without recouping what has been deliberately stolen denies the taxpayers loan capital and real assets with which to build and maintain the economy, and thereby comes at their expense. If the government gives Peter trillions of dollars, and leaves Paul with nothing, than Paul has been shortchanged by his government. In addition, Paul is expected to fight, or provide children to fight, to protect Peter and the land and holdings Peter has. This comes at Paul's expense.

I still await straightforward answers to my questions. I intend to show the inflationary pressures of closing out the debt in the course of one year, while demanding 100% backing to loans in bank reserves. I intend to show that this will give the Jews absolute control over the money markets and the supply of loan capital and afford them the opportunity to ruin America as America has never been destroyed in the past.

On the Disingenuous Responses From "Ognir" of the Disinformation Underground

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

I requested a show of good faith from Daryl Bradford Smith's parrot, who calls himself "Ognir". Instead, I received disingenuous denials and false accusations from "Ognir":

An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith

The overaged punk in effect denies that he has been unfair to me, and states, " I'd love him to post a link where I was unfair to him." This "Ognir" evidently does not consider it unfair or indecent of him to openly and immediately condone and applaud a lewd smear made against me on his unfair thread "Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Zionist Shill?" This "Ognir" evidently does not find it unfair to address the fact that I have complained about his actions and statements, and more importantly those of Daryl Bradford Smith and Muhammad Rafeeq, actions which discredit Cynthia McKinney, among many other detrimental effects; but does not address the substance of my complaints or in any way attempt to refute them, but instead appeals to emotion and declares me "angry" and has even hypocritically and angrily cursed me with vulgarity. Why is not "Ognir" insistent that my complaints be addressed? His silence speaks volumes and is itself unfair.

"Ognir" grossly misrepresents what I have stated, and claims in the thread at the Disinformation Underground An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith:

"Why is he always bitching about Jews, he seems to HATE ALL OF THEM
yet with this clear violation of International law by this shithole of a country
he says nothing, nothing about the illegal way that the 21 are being held
without access to lawyers"

and:

"You would think that CJB is also pushing the idea that the Jews arrested McKinney because she did a few interviews with us, yet again ignoring the people of Gaza and their urgent needs."

"Ognir" clearly has no regard for the truth, and instead tries to discredit me with falsehoods. I never stated nor did I ever even remotely imply that the Jews arrested Cynthia McKinney because she did interviews with Daryl Bradford Smith or "Ognir". "Ognir" will not be able to provide a single honest quotation from me to substantiate his falsehoods. "Ognir" also tells untruths when he claimed on 4 July 2009 that I have ignored the illegality of the Israeli attack on the Palestinians or their plight. Contrary to the falsehoods of "Ognir", I wrote on this blog:

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Qui veut noyer son chien l'accuse de rage

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Max Nordau stated at the First Zionist Conference in 1897:

"'If you have to drown a dog,' says the proverb, 'you must first declare him to be mad.'"

Jews often accuse their accuser in an effort to avoid the accusation. Note the Israeli spin in the following news reports:

UN expert says Israeli seizure of aid ship a crime

Activists to break Gaza blockade

The Israelis attempt to change the subject of their illegal aggression against the aid ship carrying Cynthia McKinney, to an attack on the motives of its mission. In order to justify drowning the humanitarian mission, the Jews call it mad.

The Jews claim the motivation of the aid shipment was not humanitarian, but rather public relations, as if those two concerns were mutually exclusive. They are not. It is logically consistent for an aid mission to be both the transport of humanitarian aid and a public relations effort to raise international awareness of the plight of a suffering people, which public relations effort is in itself is an humanitarian effort meant to bring relief to a victimized people.

Israelis often defame the Palestinians and try to blame them for what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, and the Israelis often deny the suffering they are willfully inflicting on the Palestinians, which unjustly harms the image of the Palestinians in the court of public opinion. To counter Israeli propaganda by drawing attention to the plight of the Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis is in itself an humanitarian effort meant to bring aid and relief to the suffering Palestinians.

It is the Israelis who have brought this story to the headlines by illegally capturing a prominent American who served in the Congress of the United States. I hope that the public relations campaign to expose the plight of the Palestinians is quite successful, as successful as it is just and necessary. The Israelis are helping it along!

Note that the Israelis instinctively believe that a public relations campaign must have a sinister purpose. Why is that?

Prior to that, I wrote on 1 July 2009:

"

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

As I Predicted, Cynthia McKinney's Name Made Mud Due to Her Associations With Daryl Bradford Smith, and His Clone, "Ognir"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Once again, I really, really, really hate to say I told you so, because Cynthia McKinney deserves better in spite of her lapse in judgement, but as I predicted Cynthia McKinney is being put through the meat grinder for associating with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Ognir":

McKinney Arrested By Israel, Appears on Hate Radio

McKinney on hate radio again

I wonder if and when CNN will pick up on this story. I heard they have connections with the CIA and sometimes put out stories for them. I know they have covered Smith in the past.

I wonder if the media will pick up on Daryl Bradford Smith & Co.'s Apollo moon landings hoax theories and how the "Zionists" allegedly profitted. Should be very entertaining for those in search of ways to discredit McKinney and change the subject from Israel's illegal attack on her.

I wish you well, courageous and selfless Cynthia. You deserve far better than what fate is doling out to you. I suggest you look into who set you up for this.

"

"Ognir" has a hard time confining himself to the truth. Will "Ognir" retract the falsehoods he has told about my statements, or is he just another Smith? Instead of providing the information I requested from him regarding "Muhammad Rafeeq", "Ognir" whines and complains as he so often does. I made a straightforward and simple request. The fact that "Ognir" desires to avoid these issues, while joining in on rampages against Alex Jones and his wife, demonstrates that "Ognir" is tendencious and not interested in the full truth, including the truth about "Muhammad Rafeeq". Everyone who follows "Ognir" already knows who and what Alex Jones is and represents. Let's find out a bit more about "Muhammad" who made an ass of himself yet again and by way of association and comment also made an ass of "Ognir", who did not object to what was said.

"Ognir" must know that I did not state nor imply that he is to blame for Cynthia McKinney's arrest. He must also know that I have dubbed that arrest "illegal" and condemned it, as well as the Israel oppression of the Palestinians. So why is "Ognir" spreading falsehoods about what I have said, instead of answering my simple and straightforward questions? Why does not "Ognir" address the real accusations I have made against him and Daryl Bradford Smith, and the intermediary who arranged their interviews with Cynthia McKinney? Why has not "Ognir" addressed the fact that he had an irrationally negative response to one of his interviews with McKinney? Why has not "Ognir" addressed the fact that he, together with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Muhammad Rafeeq" made Cynthia look bad by making themselves look bad by addressing old issues regarding accusations that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax? Why does not "Ognir" tell us the name of the intermediary who arranged these interviews with Cynthia McKinney? Why is the Disinformation Underground pushing this Apollo moon landings nonsense, including "Ognir" himself in his unfair attack on me by quoting a letter from Scott Summers on this issue, and also including the intermediary who calls himself "Lord Lindsey"?

"Ognir" pretends that I have not already refuted his nonsensical claims that Zionism has nothing to do with religion or the Jewish People. Let him respond to what I have already said with new facts and arguments, if he is able. Thus far he has only endorsed lewd smears against me, deceitfully misrepresented what I have clearly stated, and backed away from confronting "Muhammad Rafeeq".

"Ognir" is not for real. He is another Smith, and I predict that he will continue to disappoint you at critical times in our fight against World Jewry.

Friday, July 03, 2009

On the Attempt at a Critique of My Work by the Zionist Website "Judenfrei"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

A website which promotes the views of Eric Hufschmid, has attempted to besmirch me and criticize my work. In so doing, the author(s) of the openly personal attack raise a few points worth addressing.

I will start off by demonstrating the Eric Hufschmid style sophistical attacks against me which are meant to raise doubts about me, so that the relevant arguments regarding my work appear to be somehow justified and legitimate, when they are not. On the one hand I am criticized for putting too much into my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, while on the other I am accused of putting too little on my webpage about Christian Zionism. This is one of several obvious contradictions in the attack by my critics which demonstrates that they are out to demonize me with whatever petty attacks they can fabricate from whole cloth, rather than engage in a civil and fair discussion meant to arrive at the truth.

The more a view contradicts the common view, the more the proof that is required to refute the common view. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Demonstrating that Albert Einstein was a racist Jew and that Jews have always generally been a racist people was, in 2006, an extraordinary claim to make in America, and it required extraordinary proof, which I provided. Instead of thanking me for this tremendous and productive effort which cost me much time and funds, I am instead attacked for making this effort by the Zionists at "Judenfrei". Here again, we see that they are not out to be fair or civil, but instead to try make my virtues and the virtues of my work appear to somehow be weaknesses and flaws. Theirs is a common Jewish tactic. Whereas they should be thanking me and praising me, they are instead attacking me–a clear "tell" as to their motivations. "Judenfrei" misrepresents my views when it states, "He maintains the Holocaust narrative as true!" What is that narrative and where did I state that it is true?

Would "Judenfrei" have me discredit myself by denying the fact that Jews were genocided from Europe, in the sense that a people is dislocated, which is one of the definitions of genocide. Where are the prewar populations of Jews in Europe today? Would "Judenfrei" have me discredit myself by denying that there were concentration camps and discriminatory laws against Jews, or that Jews were rounded up against their will?

"Judenfrei" correctly points out that I do not much address 9/11. I do not wish to be associated with clowns like Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith who dominate that arena, nor do I wish to be associated Alex Jones and his crowd, or the dialectic created between these factions of "Truthers". I do believe that the Jews were behind the attack, and have never criticized anyone for making that claim. Again, instead of thanking me for the monumental and unequalled efforts I have made to expose the crimes of Jewry, Zionist "Judenfrei" searches for reasons to find fault with what I haven't done. If I found a cure for cancer "Judenfrei" would probably claim that I am working against humanity because I didn't cure heart disease. Their attitude reveals their motives.

While attacking me for pointing out how Christian Zionism is a contradiction in terms, again as opposed to thanking me for providing this useful and often copied work, the "Judenfrei" attack proposes that the page is somehow a diversion from other more important issues–more important than proving that Christians cannot be Zionists, issues which are obscure, to say the least, to the average Christian Zionist. Rather than have me quote the Bible which is at hand to the vast the majority of Christian Zionists, and which clearly states that Jesus is of the tribe of Judah through his descent through David making him a Jew by usual definition, rather than make a sound analysis based on readily understood and available concepts and materials, "Judenfrei" claims that I am deceptive because I do not confuse the audience with references to Khazars nor delve into the etymology of the word "Jew". Thanks but no thanks for your unsolicited advice! I prefer to show Christians what their Bible tells them about the Jews, and what the Jews' Talmud and other writings tell the Jews about Christ and Christians. This has a proven record of making Christians look with suspicion upon the Jews, whereas the Khazarian theories and Christian Identity arguments have never proven successful against the Jews.

I have addressed the Khazarian question (and the Berber and Arab origins of modern Jews and Babylonian origins of ancient Jews--where has "judenfrei" ever addressed these? what proof does "Judenfrei" offer that any tribe of Israelite ever existed outside of Jewish mythology meant to justify the theft of Palestine? why does "Judenfrei" push Jewish religious mythology on the Goyim? where are the mytholgical Israelites in the writings of the Egyptians, or for that matter where are the Jews in the writings of the Greek historians prior to or concurrent with the fabrication of the Torah?) in my books, my lectures and my articles, in contradiction to "Judenfrei's" false contentions to the contrary. I guess while searching for something to attack, "Judenfrei" overlooked those inconvenient facts.

"Judenfrei" claims that I tried to sow the seeds of discord between Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. What I did do is tell Smith I did not want to be a part of his skunk spraying contests, and that I wanted to take an intellectual approach. I suggested to them that Eric do a show of his own, and that Daryl do a show of his own and let each grow their own audience and start a network. "Judenfrei" fails to point out that Hufschmid was at that time criticizing me for attacking Zionism. It was Hufschmid, not I, who thought that it was a mistake to go full bore against the Zionists. I did tell Hufschmid that his association with Sam Danner would discredit him and I also told Smith that it would be a bad idea to be associated with Danner's story. Of course, instead of being thanked for providing this proven sound advice, I am instead attacked for it. When Hufschmid continued down the path toward discrediting himself (note that his Danner interview came immediately on the heels of his interview with me about my Einstein book and was certainly likely to taint me by association if I let it) I cut off all contact with him. Likewise, as Smith acted out in soap opera fashion instead of taking an intellectual approach to the problem, and took actions of which I did not approve and suggested things to me which made no sense to me, I cut off all contact with him. How wise history is proving me to have been!

"Judenfrei" asserts without proof that my proposed legal measures to defeat Jewry would backfire and never be accepted by Northern Europeans, on the basis that "Judenfrei" instead wants to satisfy its Zionist desire for an ingathering of the Jews in Israel. I have for a very long time, much longer than parrot proposals of some others, advocated that the Palestinians, Lebanese, and virtually all other peoples sue the Jews for their aggression and illegal acts. These measures are finally beginning to be taken and they are very effective, as evinced by the Israelis' response:

Israel worries over intense 'legal war'

"Judenfrei" would instead have us fear the retaliation of the bankers and pay them off, in addition to fulfilling the Zionist dream of gathering all the Jews of the World together in Israel.

"Judenfrei" correctly observes that I am not Zionist and I do not want the Jews to segregate and perpetuate the Jewish people. "Judenfrei" considers this a trick of some kind, and asserts without proof or logical demonstration that Northern Europeans could never be convinced of the efficacy, morality or practicality of my approach to solving the Jewish problem. History contradicts "Judenfrei's" claims. As the Nazis rounded up the Jews, most if not all of the societies welcomed the purges. There was no genuine mass sympathy for the Jews even in America and Great Britain and the Jews had to work overtime to manufacture an artificial appearance of a mere semblance of such sympathy. Informed citizens have never been sympathetic to Jewry.

Human nature is to despise an aggressive enemy. Human beings will embrace my proposals, because my proposals solve the problem, rather than fulfill Jewish messianic prophecy as "Judenfrei" would have us do. "Judenfrei" accuses with the statement, "Again, Bjerknes slyly espouses the Holocaust lie." There are many Holocaust lies, not one of which have I ever knowingly espoused. It appears that "Judenfrei" is trying to bait me into discrediting myself with general statements. Be specific "Judenfrei". Do you deny that the Nazis changed Jewish demographics in Europe in profound ways? One of the definitions of genocide is remove a people from a place. This took place, unless you can prove otherwise. If you can prove otherwise, offer the proof, but do not speak in vagaries and accusations for which you offer no proof.

"Judenfrei's" arguments on banking and economic matters are a bit more interesting and better thought out, though still fatally riddled with contradictions, misrepresentations, omissions, apologetics and other flaws which defeat them. Numerous unproven assumptions appear in the presentation and there are even more alternative outcomes which are left unacknowledged and unaddressed. What proof is there that paying off debt holders will result in banks being able to maintain 100% reserves and still offer enough credit to prevent deflation and economic collapse? What proof is there that banks will remain solvent under these proposals, or that there will be the profits needed to create such banks, or that citizens and businesses will make such substantial deposits as would be need to grow the economy? On what basis is the claim made that no economic growth will be needed merely because our money will become debt free? While it is true that we will not need to create value to pay interest, this does not imply that will not need to create economic growth. Do we not wish to better our society? Do we not wish to out compete our international competitors? Do we not need to become more self sufficient?

Before redressing the attacks made against me, I ask "Judenfrei" to substantiate the unproven assumptions made in the proposals offered, and to quote directly where I have made the assertions "Judenfrei" claims I have made. If and when that it is done, I believe I will have an easy time pointing out the necessary consequences and alternative scenarios left out of "Judenfrei's" borrowed utopian proposals that leave the Jews as absolute masters of the money markets and the World economy.

What, if any, is the relationship between "Judenfrei" and the original author of the banking reform proposals which "Judenfrei" advocates? What, if any, is the relationship between "Judenfrei" and Eric Hufschmid? Why do you, "Judenfrei", want to fulfill the Zionists' fondest wish and ingather the Jews to Palestine? Please don't obfuscate the issue with tired lectures about who and what Jews, Israelites and Judahites are and were, other than to let us know whether you are pushing Christian Identity, or British Israel, or some other such Jewish manufactured theories or theory. Just answer the question. Why do you want to help the Zionists to place all Jews alive today in the Nation of Israel? I have responded to your concerns. Kindly respond to mine.

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Qui veut noyer son chien l'accuse de rage

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Max Nordau stated at the First Zionist Conference in 1897:

"'If you have to drown a dog,' says the proverb, 'you must first declare him to be mad.'"

Jews often accuse their accuser in an effort to avoid the accusation. Note the Israeli spin in the following news reports:

UN expert says Israeli seizure of aid ship a crime

Activists to break Gaza blockade

The Israelis attempt to change the subject of their illegal aggression against the aid ship carrying Cynthia McKinney, to an attack on the motives of its mission. In order to justify drowning the humanitarian mission, the Jews call it mad.

The Jews claim the motivation of the aid shipment was not humanitarian, but rather public relations, as if those two concerns were mutually exclusive. They are not. It is logically consistent for an aid mission to be both the transport of humanitarian aid and a public relations effort to raise international awareness of the plight of a suffering people, which public relations effort is in itself is an humanitarian effort meant to bring relief to a victimized people.

Israelis often defame the Palestinians and try to blame them for what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, and the Israelis often deny the suffering they are willfully inflicting on the Palestinians, which unjustly harms the image of the Palestinians in the court of public opinion. To counter Israeli propaganda by drawing attention to the plight of the Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis is in itself an humanitarian effort meant to bring aid and relief to the suffering Palestinians.

It is the Israelis who have brought this story to the headlines by illegally capturing a prominent American who served in the Congress of the United States. I hope that the public relations campaign to expose the plight of the Palestinians is quite successful, as successful as it is just and necessary. The Israelis are helping it along!

Note that the Israelis instinctively believe that a public relations campaign must have a sinister purpose. Why is that?

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Three Tricks of the Jewish Controlled "Alternative Media" Trade

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

The "alternative media" often causes people harm by discrediting people through agents provocateur who sucker their victims into associating with them in some way, while, unbeknownst to the victim, they act in an outrageous manner which is bound to discredit everyone who has associated with them. Sometimes smearmongers will bite their victims in the rump and claim that they don't go far enough in condemning the "Zionists". In this way, the victim is smeared in the mainstream media, and loses all support among dissidents and dissenters who would otherwise support them.

Another game played is when the mainstream media condemns someone, and then the "alternative media" claims that person is a "Zionist agent". In this way, the person is condemned by the general public, and loses all support among those who would otherwise support him or her.

A third means to double team a person working against the Jews is for the mainstream media to ignore whistleblowers, while the "alternative media" condemns them for participating in the first place, or not coming forward sooner. Here again, the victim is universally condemned for attempting to rescue humanity from the Jewish attack.

As I Predicted, Cynthia McKinney's Name Made Mud Due to Her Associations With Daryl Bradford Smith, and His Clone, "Ognir"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Once again, I really, really, really hate to say I told you so, because Cynthia McKinney deserves better in spite of her lapse in judgement, but as I predicted Cynthia McKinney is being put through the meat grinder for associating with Daryl Bradford Smith and "Ognir":

McKinney Arrested By Israel, Appears on Hate Radio

McKinney on hate radio again

I wonder if and when CNN will pick up on this story. I heard they have connections with the CIA and sometimes put out stories for them. I know they have covered Smith in the past.

I wonder if the media will pick up on Daryl Bradford Smith & Co.'s Apollo moon landings hoax theories and how the "Zionists" allegedly profitted. Should be very entertaining for those in search of ways to discredit McKinney and change the subject from Israel's illegal attack on her.

I wish you well, courageous and selfless Cynthia. You deserve far better than what fate is doling out to you. I suggest you look into who set you up for this.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

The Reasons Why Neturei Karta Do Not Represent the Views of World Jewry

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

In spite of spurious claims to the contrary, Neturei Karta Jews are Talmudists. It is the Babylonian Talmud (Tractate Kethuboth, Folio 111a) which tells them that they must wait for the arrival of the Jewish messiah before Jews should travel en masse to Palestine and Greater Israel. This was the view of Orthodox Jewry until the time of the Holocaust.

Today, and since 1948, the majority of Jews believe that they have fulfilled the religious requirements for genociding the Palestinians, in that the Jews believe that they have atoned for their ancient sins of apostasy through the Holocaust and therefore are entitled to steal the land of Palestine and occupy it, just as Moses and Joshua sought to do.

This is not the first time that Jewry believed it received atonement through mass suffering. The Jews believed that their messiah would soon arrive after the Ukrainian pogroms and then welcomed Shabbatai Zevi as if that messiah.

The descendants of the Shabbataians believe that the messiah has already arrived and lives today in the body of the man who has inherited the soul of Zevi and the throne of Judah. The majority of other Jews believe that the Jewish People itself are the messiah and are themselves divine in their nature, or at least vastly superior in spirit, talent, intellect, etc. to the Goyim and have the inherited right to murder, cheat, rule over, subvert and steal from the Goyim.

Therefore, the views of the Neturei Karta are a tiny minority view among Jewry. The Jews believe, and this belief is manifest in the Star of David on the Jewish flag, that "As Above, So Below". This means to them, that politics on Earth are politics in heaven, and that the battles they wage on the Goyim in the mundane realm are mirrored in wars between the Elohim, Sammael and the Jewish God/Devil in the heavens. There is, therefore, no distinction between politics and religion for the religious Jew.

The secular Jew is the same animal speaking a different jargon with the same objectives and fundamental beliefs. The secular Jew has abandoned the fox tail stigmata and taken up the briefcase, but holds firm to the core purposes of Judaism to segregate Jews, rob and destroy the Goyim, and genocide the native populations of Greater Israel. That is the Jewish People and always has been. The acts of the Zionists mirror, and are based upon, the religious mythology of Moses and Joshua, and the Jews of Israel gleefully acknowledge this. Judaism is an expression of the Jewish People, the Jews came first and created Judaism which produced Zionism as the only viable means of fulfilling Judaism.

There is no Jewish God to come down and create a Jewish messiah. There is no Jewish God to come down and exterminate the hated Goyim. There is no Jewish God to implement usury as a means to rule the World. These are and must be done by the Jewish People, and the Jewish People are, and always have been, accomplishing these objectives, taught to them in Judaism, for themselves without any supernatural intervention, for no such supernatural intervention is possible. The Jews know that Neturei Karta would have them waiting forever to do what they are doing for themselves today, and the Jews reject Neturei Karta as fools and tools of the Goyim, whom the Jews hate and seek to destroy.

The Jews believe either that the Jewish messiah has arrived in the form of Zevi or Schneerson; or, that the Jewish People are themselves the Jewish messiah; or, that Jewish People created the mythology of Judaism as a product of their self-declared unique and superior nature, and therefore it is the duty of all Jews as a people to forward the objectives of the leaders of World Jewry and of Jewish religious myth (this is why secular Jewish Communism and secular Jewish Zionism both create the messianic Jewish world of one World government centered in Jerusalem ruled by the Jews and created in the ashes of destroyed Goy nations as prophesied throughout Jewish literature from the beginning). Judaism, Communism and Zionism all have the same objectives, the destruction of the Goyim and the elevation of the Jews to the status of gods on Earth. That is the Jewish People whatever mythological gown they don. This has always been so, and shows no signs of changing.

An Irish Clone of Daryl Bradford Smith

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

There is an Irish clone of Daryl Bradford Smith who pretends to be an informed opponent of "Zionism", but who parrots the same garbage as Daryl Bradford Smith, that Zionism has nothing to do with religion, especially not Judaism, nor Jews as a people. Like Smith, this clown contradicts himself by criticizing the highly religious Christian Zionists, and the highest dogma of Judaism, the Talmud; as well as criticizing the Jewish State of Israel which contains some 1/3 of World Jewry, and which is supported by the vast majority of diaspora Jewry.

I am reminded of the thorough infiltration of Ireland by British Intelligence, such as is documented in this article:

Roy the Rat — driver for Gerry Adams, spy for MI5

The Irish have always been handicapped by agents working for British intelligence. Intelligence operatives often engage in smear campaigns, often involving degenerate images and lies. People who sincerely oppose World Jewry face these attacks.

This Daryl Bradford Smith clone tells us nothing new. Instead, like Smith and Hufschmid, he whines about Alex Jones ad nauseam as if that ceaseless mantra is a solution to the Jewish Question. Smith told me he had never read the Bible and never would. I suspect his clone knows next to nothing about Judaism, as well. So on what basis do these ignoramuses conclude that Judaism has nothing to do Zionism? Have they never heard of Abraham, or Moses, or Joshua? Why do they suppose the Jews want to take Palestine and build a temple on the site of the Dome of the Rock?

This clown wrote to me back in May of 2008 requesting an interview. I looked into the interviews he was doing and concluded that he was a new Smith. I warned you about Ron Paul. I warned you about Smith. I warned you about the Timothy McVeigh Team. I am steering clear of this Irish clone of Smith. He contributes no new research. He is painfully ignorant and uninsightful in the topics he pretends to address. He is a smearmonger and a hypocrite. I ignored him before, and am glad I trusted my insticts.

The clown is again soliciting an interview from me. He likes to draw attention to himself. If he agrees, I will interview him on my terms, and delve into the reasons for his parroted delusions of the nature of the Jewish Problem. But first he must demonstrate a measure of good faith and demand that his friend "Muahmmad Rafeeq" tell us his, this "Muhammad's", birth name and the birth names of his grandparents. I also want him to ask "Muhammad" how he came to know such Cabalistic secrets as the process for transmutating the soul of Shabbatai Zevi into the person of a Rothschild, as "Muhammad" has claimed to know.

As is my nature, I will be fair to this snake, who is so unfair to me. Let him explain himself and attempt to justify his parroted Smith routine. I note that Smith and his fellow clown run off lists of names and events, or babble off the same attacks on Jones, or excuses for World Jewry, as if such a recitation constitutes some sort of insight. Such drivel I will not permit. I want to find out what our Irish friend thinks he knows and show him where he is wrong. Then we will discover if he can stop acting like an overage punk and at least try to conduct himself as a decent man, though I do not hold out much hope for that.

Henry Ford's Peace Ship and Cynthia McKinney's Aid Ship

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

In December of 1915, Henry Ford arranged a peace mission to Northern Europe to bring the Jewish manufactured First World War to a close. On that voyage, the Jews Herman Bernstein and Rosika Schwimmer told Ford that the Jews had started the war and only the Jews could bring it to a close. Ford attributed his first knowledge of the Jewish Question to this revelation.

Bernstein betrayed Ford and left the mission. Schwimmer was herself betrayed by Fannie Fern Andrews and Jane Addams. Ford's peace mission was thereby subverted.

After Ford returned, the press libeled him and he won a lawsuit for defamation. The Jewish press ridiculed Ford for being a pacifist and for warning that the US arms build up was a step towards America's entrance into the war.

Ford was set up from the beginning to fail.

One has to wonder what the Jews may have done to subvert Cynthia McKinney's aid ship to the hurting Palestinians in Gaza. One has to wonder what the Jews are doing to soil her reputation.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Is Cynthia McKinney Being Set Up to Be Discredited? Is She Aware of What Is Going on and Does She Approve of It?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Cynthia McKinney has foolishly associated herself with a troop of clowns through an intermediary who is now heavily pushing the conspiracy theory that the moon landings were a hoax. This man sings the praises of Daryl Bradford Smith, Michael Collins Piper and members of Daryl Bradford Smith & Co. Has this man ever informed McKinney of "Ognir's" negative reaction to one of his interviews with her, which this man apparently arranged? Will Daryl Bradford Smith & Co. bite Cynthia in the rump? Lay down with dogs and you'll wake up with fleas. Why are Smith, "Rafeeq", and the intermediary now pushing hard the Eric Hufschmid "shtick" that the moon landings were a hoax? Why are they claiming that old information is breaking news? Will McKinney now be discredited by this, through her association with this clown troop?

I suggest that someone who knows Cynthia McKinney contact her and inform her of what is going on.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

On the Heels of His Cynthia McKinney Interview, Daryl Bradford Smith & Co. Turn Up the Hufschmid "Shtick" on the Moon Landings

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Daryl Bradford Smith & Co. are now promoting old information about the moon shots as if new news. They are going full blast with an Eric Hufschmid style routine about the "Power Hour" and moon landings. I hope McKinney is not affected by this.

She has exhibited terrible judgement working with this crew. It appears that someone going by the moniker "Lord Lindsey" has arranged these interviews.

Smith has also repeatedly interviewed Ralph Nader, who had the effect of a spoiler candidate to elect George Bush. Why would Nader associate with the likes of Smith, who has been featured on CNN? Would not such an association be political suicide? Why haven't Nader and others been associated with Smith in the press as a means to discredit them? I wonder if McKinney will be tied to Smith at the right time.

A Note on Daryl Bradford Smith's Cheerleaders

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Daryl Bradford Smith and his cheerleaders are trying to immunize Smith from criticism by claiming that anyone who criticizes Smith is "acting like Hufschmid", while ignoring the fact that Smith acted with Hufschmid for years, and was in fact much worse than Hufschmid in Smith's rabidly vicious attacks on people. This tells me that the pom pom squad for the Smith shares his hypocrisy and irrationality and is not interested in the truth. This fact is further proven by their refusal to confront Smith on the falsehoods he has stated.

This group also perpetually criticizes Jeff Rense and Alex Jones, but do not feel that they are "acting like Hufschmid" in so doing. I guess immunity from criticism is the limited privilege of the smearmonger Daryl Bradford Smith.

To "act like Hufschmid" is to act like Smith, to attempt to smear people with false accusations and with innuendo, to change the subject from the relevant issues, to carry around a cheerleading section, instead of fighting your own battles, etc. I do not act like Hufschmid and Smith. I am not an act. They are, and they shared the stage together for years.

Daryl Bradford Smith's Antics Remind Us: "Those Who Forget the Past Are Condemned to Repeat It"--George Santayana

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

While Daryl Bradford Smith whines and cries that he is a poor helpless victim of Eric Hufschmid, which is quite frankly stereotypical Jewish behavior denying his personal responsibility and blaming someone else for his actions, let us not forget how Smith has distracted us at crucial times with his soap opera antics.

Let us also not forget Smith's vicious use of octogenarian Eustace Mullins to attack others. Or Smith's promotion of Christopher Bollyn after having defamed Bollyn to me and others. Or Smith's ridiculous claim that Christopher Bollyn was kidnaped or murdered. Smith tried to interest me in some woman named "Nina", who was of no interest to me. Smith tried to prompt me to initiate a boycott against Israel for publicity purposes, at a time when Smith was revealing that there were laws against participating in certain classes of boycotts against Israel. Smith has not yet disclosed to his audience much of that which he told me about "Muhammad Rafeeq". Smith did not contradict "Rafeeq" when "Rafeeq" claimed it was he who had discussed the Chabad Lubavitch on GNC immediately prior to Smith's cancellation on that network, when in fact I was the one who discussed Chabad Lubavitch with Smith, and Smith only interviewed "Rafeeq" after Smith's GCN show was cancelled. Smith attacked Ernst Zuendel while the man was completely vulnerable. Smith attacked John Kaminski, but later told us he had old and close ties to Kaminski. Smith attacked Michael Collins Piper in unforgivable ways, but is now promoted by Piper, who also heavily promoted the Sam Danner fiasco despite being advised against it. Smith worked with Bollyn and Hufschmid who promoted the Sam Danner fiasco, which was a terrible distraction at a crucial moment in our struggle against Jewry. I warned Hufschmid immediately after he posted his initial interview with Danner that the story was not credible and would damage all involved. I immediately suggested to Christopher Bollyn on John Stadmiller's radio show that he consider the possibility that he was being "Dan Rather'd". I cut off all ties to these men following their promotion of the Sam Danner story, in spite of their being advised against it.

This is just a very short list of things to consider when remembering the past in an attempt to avoid the future Daryl Bradford Smith. Just wait, history will repeat itself. The Smith cycle of attempting to garner credibility to lend credibility to his distractions, soap operas, uncredible attacks, shows no signs of abating.

I again ask that people who support Daryl Bradford Smith not contact me. The tell that they are not interested in the truth is the fact that they do not demand that Smith and/or "Rafeeq" answer my questions. Another tell is that they promote the nonsense that creepy Eric Hufschmid had the power to Svengali poor little Smith, but nonetheless Smith is a credible man.