Saturday, January 23, 2010

In Defense of the Truth and the Right to Speak It: O'Connell Is Innocent: Jews Are Racists. Part 1

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com


The racist Australian government is harassing an innocent man, Brendon O'Connell, merely because he allegedly stated that Jews are racists. Jews are, in fact, racists and it is not a crime to iterate this eternal truth.

I will soon be releasing a new book which I am presently writing, The Protocols of the Old Testament. I will publish some of the text from that work here on my blog as proof that the alleged statements of Brendon O'Connell are demonstrably true and that it is in the public interest for these facts to be widely and openly discussed, disseminated and known.

The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament, is saturated with racism and expresses the genocidal Jewish plan to exterminate all non-Jews.

In the Old Testament, the racist and genocidal Jews call themselves the "holy seed" (Ezra 9:2. Isaiah 6:13; 44:2-3; 59:20-21.) and the "elect" of their god (Isaiah 42:1; 45:4) who will survive the apocalypse, after which the Jews will have exterminated all non-Jews (In the Old Testament, see: Deuteronomy 32:43; 33:29. Psalms 2:1-2, 8-9;18:40-50; 72:1-20; 75:3, 10; 79:6-7; 82:6-8; 83:9-10; 110:6; 137:8-9 Isaiah 11:4; 17:12-13; 33:12; 34:2; 41:11-12; 42:1; 49:26; 60:16; 65; 66. Jeremiah 2:3; 10:10-11, 25; 30:11; 33:15-16; 46:28. Ezekiel 25:14. Amos 9:8-10. Obadiah 1:18. Micah 4:12-13; 5:8. Zephaniah 3:8. Zechariah 2:8-9; 12:2. In the Babylonian Talmud it states that non-Jews and proselytes will have no place in the future world, see: Tractate Abodah Zarah, folio 3b. Tractate Yebamoth, folio 24b. Tractate Sanhedrin, folio 105a). The hateful Jews plan on sending all non-Jews to Hell forever (Psalms 9:17. Ezekiel 32:17-32).

The Old Testament, which claims that Jews and their seed are divine, calls Gentiles unclean animals, subhuman and filthy beasts, whom the Jews must exterminate.

Leviticus 20:25-26:

"Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine."

Leviticus 22:25:

"Neither from a stranger's hand shall ye offer the bread of your God of any of these; because their corruption is in them, and blemishes be in them: they shall not be accepted for you."

Ezra 9:2-3:

"Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites. For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass. And when I heard this thing, I rent my garment and my mantle, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down astonied."

Ezra 10:11:

"Now therefore make confession unto the LORD God of your fathers, and do his pleasure: and separate yourselves from the people of the land, and from the strange wives."

Nehemiah 9:2:

"And the seed of Israel separated themselves from all strangers, and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers."

Nehemiah 13:3:

"Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude."

Isaiah 6:13:

"But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be eaten: as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when they cast their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof."

Isaiah 42:1:

"Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles."

Isaiah 44:2-3:

"Thus saith the LORD that made thee, and formed thee from the womb, which will help thee; Fear not, O Jacob, my servant; and thou, Jesurun, whom I have chosen. For I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring:"

Isaiah 45:3-4:

"And I will give thee the treasures of darkness, and hidden riches of secret places, that thou mayest know that I, the LORD, which call thee by thy name, am the God of Israel. For Jacob my servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me."

Isaiah 59:20-21:

"And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the LORD. As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever."

Isaiah 65:9:

"And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob, and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there."

Isaiah 65:17:

"For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind."

Isaiah 65:22:

"They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands."

Isaiah 66:22:

"For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain."

Ezekiel 16:26:

"Thou hast also committed fornication with the Egyptians thy neighbours, great of flesh; and hast increased thy whoredoms, to provoke me to anger."

Ezekiel 23:20:

"Yet she multiplied her whoredoms, in calling to remembrance the days of her youth, wherein she had played the harlot in the land of Egypt. For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses."

Ezekiel 34:31:

"And ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men, and I am your God, saith the Lord GOD."

Ezekiel 36:36-38:

"Then the heathen that are left round about you shall know that I the LORD build the ruined places, and plant that that was desolate: I the LORD have spoken it, and I will do it. Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will yet for this be inquired of by the house of Israel, to do it for them; I will increase them with men like a flock. As the holy flock, as the flock of Jerusalem in her solemn feasts; so shall the waste cities be filled with flocks of men: and they shall know that I am the LORD."

The Jewish, as opposed to Christian and Muslim, interpretations of these Old Testament passages are found in the Talmud and Cabalah. The Talmud states:

"'If he sells to a heathen' -- because a heathen is certainly not subject to [the exhortation], 'And thou shalt do that which is right and good in the sight of the Lord.' "--I. Epstein, Editor, H. Freedman, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Nezikin, Tractate Baba Mezia, folio 108b, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 619-622, at 619.

"For it has been taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai said: The graves of Gentiles do not defile, for it is written, And ye my flock, the flock of my pastures, are men;6 only ye are designated 'men'.7 "--I. Epstein, Editor, H. Freedman, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Nezikin, Tractate Baba Mezia, folio 114b, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 651-653, at 651.

"Raba stated: With reference to the Rabbinical statement that [legally] an Egyptian has no father,10 it must not be imagined that this is due to [the Egyptians'] excessive indulgence in carnal gratification, owing to which it is not known [who the father was], but that if this were known1 it is to be taken into consideration;2 but [the fact is] that even if this is known it is not taken into consideration. For, surely, in respect of twin brothers, who originated in one drop that divided itself into two, it was nevertheless stated in the final clause,3 that they 'neither participate in halizah nor perform levirate marriage'.4 Thus it may be inferred that the All Merciful declared their children to be legally fatherless,5 for [so indeed it is also] written, Whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.6"--I. Epstein, Editor, I. W. Slotki, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Nashim, Tractate Yebamoth, Volume 2, folio 98a, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 670-673, at 670-671.

"It was taught: And so did R. Simeon b. Yohai state [61a] that the graves of idolaters do not impart levitical uncleanness by an ohel,15 for it is said, And ye My sheep the sheep of My pasture, are men;1 you are called men2 but the idolaters are not called men.2"--I. Epstein, Editor, I. W. Slotki, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Nashim, Tractate Yebamoth, Volume 1, folios 60b-61a, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 401-408, at 40-405.

"AND WHATEVER [WOMAN] WHO CANNOT CONTRACT KIDDUSHIN etc. How do we know [it of] a Canaanitish bondmaid?13 -- Said R. Huna, Scripture saith, Abide ye here with ['im] the ass14 -- it is a people ['am] like unto an ass.15 We have thus found that kiddushin with her is invalid: [68b] how do we know that the issue takes her status? -- Because Scripture saith, the wife and her children shall be her master's.1 How do we know [it of a freeborn] Gentile woman? -- Scripture saith, neither shalt thou make marriages with them.2 How do we know that her issue bears her status? -- R. Johanan said on the authority of R. Simeon b. Yohai, Because Scripture saith, For he will turn away thy son from following me:3 thy son by4 an Israelite woman is called thy son, but thy son by a heathen is not called thy son.5"--I. Epstein, Editor, H. Freedman Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Dashim, Tractate Kiddushin, folio 68a, The Soncino Press, London, (1936), pp. 342-345, at 344-345.

"OR USES OF ANOINTING. Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: Upon the flesh of man [adam] shall it not be poured;6 and cattle and vessels are not man. Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called a corpse and not man. But why is one exempt in the case of heathens; are they not in the category of adam? -- No, it is written: And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]:7 Ye are called adam but heathens are not called adam."--I. Epstein, Editor, I. Porusch, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Kodashim, Tractate Keritoth, folio 6b, The Soncino Press, London, (1948), pp. 43-47, at 45.

"R. Hamnuna further said: If one sees a crowd of Israelites, he should say: Blessed is He who discerneth secrets.5 If he sees a crowd of heathens, he should say: Your mother shall be ashamed, etc.6 [***] Our Rabbis taught: On seeing the Sages of Israel one should say: Blessed be He who hath imparted of His wisdom to them that fear Him. On seeing the Sages of other nations, one says, Blessed be He who hath imparted of His wisdom to His creatures. On seeing kings of Israel, one says: Blessed be He who hath imparted of His glory to them that fear Him. On seeing non-Jewish kings, one says: Blessed be He who hath imparted of His glory to His creatures. R. Johanan said: A man should always exert himself and run to meet an Israelitish king; and not only a king of Israel but also a king of any other nation, so that if he is deemed worthy,1 he will be able to distinguish between the kings of Israel and the kings of other nations. [***] R. Shila administered lashes to a man who had intercourse with an Egyptian5 [footnote 5 in the Soncino Edition states: "Var. lec. Gentile." Varia lectio is Latin for: "a variant reading", indicating that Jews do not only consider Egyptians, but all non-Jews to be subhuman animals.--CJB] woman. The man went and informed against him to the Government, saying: There is a man among the Jews who passes judgment without the permission of the Government. An official was sent to [summon] him. When he came he was asked: Why did you flog that man? He replied: Because he had intercourse with a she-ass. They said to him: Have you witnesses? He replied: I have. Elijah thereupon came in the form of a man and gave evidence. They said to him: If that is the case he ought to be put to death! He replied: Since we have been exiled from our land, we have no authority to put to death; do you do with him what you please. While they were considering his case, R. Shila exclaimed, Thine, Oh Lord, is the greatness and the power.1 What are you saying? they asked him. He replied: What I am saying is this: Blessed is the All-Merciful who has made the earthly royalty on the model of the heavenly, and has invested you with dominion, and made you lovers of justice. They said to him: Are you so solicitous for the honour of the Government? They handed him a staff2 and said to him: You may act as judge. When he went out that man said to him: Does the All-Merciful perform miracles for liars? He replied: Wretch! Are they not called asses? For it is written: Whose flesh is as the flesh of asses.3 He noticed that the man was about to inform them that he had called them asses. He said: This man is a persecutor, and the Torah has said: If a man comes to kill you, rise early and kill him first.4 So he struck him with the staff and killed him. [***] Our Rabbis taught: On seeing the houses of Israel, when inhabited one says: Blessed be He who sets the boundary of the widow;4 when uninhabited, Blessed be the judge of truth. On seeing the houses of heathens, when inhabited, one says: The Lord will pluck up the house of the proud;5 when uninhabited he says: O Lord, thou God, to whom vengeance belongeth, thou God, to whom vengeance belongeth, shine forth.3 [***] Our Rabbis taught: On seeing Israelitish graves, one should say: Blessed is He who fashioned you in judgments who fed you in judgment and maintained you in judgment, and in judgment gathered you in, and who will one day raise you up again in judgment. Mar, the son of Rabina, concluded thus in the name of R. Nahman: And who knows the number of all of you; and He will one day revive you and establish you. Blessed is He who revives the dead.4 On seeing the graves of heathens one says: Your mother shall be sore ashamed, etc. [***] R. Joshua b. Levi said: On seeing pock-marked persons one says: Blessed be He who makes strange creatures. An objection was raised: If one sees a negro, a very red or very white person, a hunchback, a dwarf or a dropsical person, he says: Blessed be He who makes strange creatures. "--I. Epstein, Editor, M. Simon, Translator and Annotator, The Babylonian Talmud, Seder Zeraim, Tractate Berakoth, folios 58a-b, The Soncino Press, London, (1948), pp. 359-366.

Jakob Ecker's Der ,Judenspiegel' im Lichte der Wahrheit: Eine wissenschaftliche Untersuchung, Bonifacius-Druckerei, Paderborn, (1884), p. 120; states that the Jewish Tosapoth (additions to the Talmud) declare that the seed of Gentiles is to be regarded as cattle seed, and that copulating with Gentiles is like having sexual relations with beasts:

"Tosaphoth zu Talmud Kethuboth 3, b:

,,Sein (des AKUM) Same wird angesehen wie Viehsame.''

Tosaphoth zu Talmud Sanhedrin 74, b:

,,Concubitus AKUM ist wie concubitus bestiae.''"

See Ecker's book at pages 18-24 for proof that the term "Akum" refers to non-Jews.

The next major Jewish commentary on the Old Testament after the Talmud is the Cabalah, specifically, the Zohar, which states, inter alia:

"AND SARAH SAW THE SON OF HAGAR THE EGYPTIAN, WHOM SHE HAD BORN UNTO ABRAHAM, MAKING SPORT. R. Hiya said: 'After recording the birth of Isaac, the Scripture never mentions Ishmael by name so long as he was still in the house of Abraham: dross cannot be mentioned in the presence of gold. Hence Ishmael is referred to here as the son of Hagar the Egyptian, as it was not fitting that his name should be mentioned in the presences of Isaac.' Said R. Isaac: 'The words and Sarah saw imply that she looked at him disdainfully, as being the son not of Abraham but of Hagar the Egyptian, and, furthermore, only Sarah regarded him so, but not Abraham, as we read that THE THING WAS VERY GRIEVOUS IN ABRAHAM'S SIGHT ON ACCOUNT OF HIS SON-not the son of Hagar, but his son.' R. Simeon said: 'The Scripture really speaks in praise of Sarah. For what she saw was that he was indulging in idolatrous practices. Hence she said: Surely, this not the son of Abraham, who follows in the footsteps of Abraham, but the son of Hagar the Egyptian, who is reverting to the type of his mother. Hence: AND SHE SAID UNTO ABRAHAM: CAST OUT THIS BONDWOMAN AND HER SON; FOR THE SON OF THIS BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE HEIR WITH MY SON, EVEN WITH ISAAC.' The truth, therefore, is that she observed him worshipping idols, and performing the practices which his mother had taught him. Hence the words of Sarah, For the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir, as much as to say: I know that he will never enter the fold of the true faith and that he will have no portion with my son either in this world or in the world to come. Therefore God supported her, since He wished to keep the holy seed carefully separated, for that was the end for which He created the world, as Israel was already in His thought before the creation of the world. It was therefore that Abraham appeared in the world, so that the world could be sustained for his sake. Abraham and Isaac together upheld the world, yet they were not firmly established until Jacob came into the world. When Jacob appeared, both Abraham and Isaac became firmly established and the whole world with them. From Jacob the holy people gradually emerged into the world, and so the whole of existence became duly established according to the holy pattern. Hence God said, In all that Sarah saith unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall seed be called to thee, i.e. in Isaac and not in Ishmael. [colored emphasis added--CJB]"--The Zohar, Volume 1, Vayera, I, folio 118b, Soncino, London, (1933), pp. 367-368.

Additional proof that the Jews view non-Jews as if subhuman was gathered by Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, who wrote in his The Traditions of the Jews, Contained in the Talmud and other Mystical Writings, Volume 1, J. Robinson, London, (1748), pp. 254-255:

"In the Great Jalkut Rubeni, in the Parasha Bereshith, [Footnote: Fol. 10. Col. 1.] we have the following Passage, 'The Skin and the Flesh is the Coat of a Man. The Spirit within is the Man. But the Idolaters (meaning all the Nations but the Jewish) are not call'd Men, because their Souls have their Origin from the Unclean Spirit. But the Souls of the Israelites are derived from the Holy Spirit.' And a little farther on in the same Treatise, it is said, [Footnote: Fol. 10. Col. 2.] 'An Israelite is called a Man, because his Soul cometh from the Supreme Man. But an Idolater, whose Soul cometh from the Unclean Spirit, is call'd a Swine. If so, then is an Idolater the Body and Soul of a Swine.' In another Part of the said Treatise, entitled Shaar olam hattobu [Footnote: Fol. 23. Col. 4.], there is a Passage running thus: 'The Wicked are stiled the Dead in their Life-Time, because they have not a Holy Soul from the Foundation, which is called Him that liveth for ever. But they have the Soul from Kelifa (i. e. the Shell) by which is meant the Devil) who is call'd Death, and the Shadow of Death: And through the Sparklings of the same they live.'"

Likewise, I. B. Pranaitis wrote in his book The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, Eugene Nelson Sanctuary, New York, (1939), pp. 49-51:

"7. NOT LIKE MEN, BUT BEASTS

In Kerithuth (6b p. 78) it says:

'The teaching of the Rabbis is: He who pours oil over a Goi, and over dead bodies is freed from punishment. This is true for an animal because it is not a man.48 But how can it be said that by pouring oil over a Goi one is freed from punishment, since a Goi is also a man? But this is not true, for it is written: Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men (Ezechiel, XXXIV, 31). You are thus called men, but the Goim are not called men.'

In the Tract Makkoth (7b) he is said to be guilty of killing 'except when, if intending to kill an animal he kills a man by mistake, or intending to kill a Goi, he kills an Israelite.'

In Orach Chaiim (225, 10) it says:

'He who sees beautiful creatures, even though it be an Akum or an animal, let him say 'Blessed art thou Our Lord God, King of the Universe, who has placed such things on the earth!''

8. THEY DIFFER ONLY IN FORM FROM BEASTS

In Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d) it says:

'God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him.'

We can quote here also what is said in Orach Chaiim, 57, 6a:

'If pigs are to be pitied when they suffer from disease, because their intestines are similar to ours, how much more should the Akum be pitied when thus affected.'49

9. ANIMALS

In Zohar, II, (64b) it says:

'...People who worship idols, and who are called cow and ass, as it is written: I have a cow and an ass...'

Rabbi Bechai, in his book Kad Hakkemach, ch. I, beginning with the word Geulah -- redemption -- referring to Psalm 80, v.13:

The boar out of the wood doth waste it, says:

'The letter ain is dropped [suspended] the same as these worshippers are followers of him who was suspended.'

Buxtorf (Lex.) says:

'By wild pig the author here means the Christians who eat pork and, like pigs, have destroyed the vineyard of Israel, the City of Jerusalem, and who believe in the 'suspended' Christ. Else the letter ain is dropped in this word because they, as worshippers of Christ who was hanged, are also dropped.'

Rabbi Edels, in commenting on Kethuboth (110b) says:

'The Psalmist compares the Akum to the unclean beast in the woods.'

10. WORSE THAN ANIMALS

Rabbi Schelomo Iarchi (Raschi), famous Jewish commentator, explaining the law of Moses (Deuter. XIV, 21) forbidding the eating of meat of wounded animals, but which must be given to the 'stranger in thy gates,' or which, according to Exodus (XXII, 30) is to be thrown to the dogs, has this to say:

'. . . for he is like a dog. Are we to take to word 'dog' here literally? By no means. For the text in speaking of dead bodies says, Or thou mayest sell it to an alien. This applies much more to the meat of wounded animals, for which it is permitted to accept payment. Why therefore does the Scripture say it may be thrown to 'dogs?' In order to teach you that a dog is to be more respected than the Nokhri.'

11. THEY PROPAGATE LIKE BEASTS

In the Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth, it says:

'The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like that of a beast.'

And in Kethuboth (3b) it says:

'The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast.'

Hence it is to be inferred that Christian marriage is not true marriage.

In Kidduschim (68a), it says:

'. . . How do we know this? Rabbi Huna says: You can read: Remain here with the ass, that is, with a people like an ass. Hence it appears that they are not capable of contracting marriage.'

And in Eben Haezer (44, 8):

'If a Jew enters into marriage with an Akum (Christian), or with his servant, the marriage is null. For they are not capable of entering into matrimony. Likewise if an Akum or a servant enter into matrimony with a Jew, the marriage is null.'

In Zohar (II, 64b) it says:

'Rabbi Abba says: If only idolaters alone had sexual intercourse, the world would not continue to exist. Hence we are taught that a Jew should not give way to those infamous robbers. For if these propagate in greater numbers, it will be impossible for us to continue to exist because of them. For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs.'"

We find the racist Jews Isaac Luria, Nachman of Bratslav and Shneur Zalman degrading Gentiles as if sub-human. Shneur Zalman believed that:

"Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Consequently, references to gentiles in Rabbi Shneur Zalman's teachings are invariably invidious. . . . Their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews, as the pieces of chaff outnumber the kernels. . . . All Jews were innately good, all gentiles innately evil. Jews were the pinnacle of creation and served the Creator, gentiles its nadir and worshiped the heavenly hosts."-- From: A. Nadler, "Last Exit to Brooklyn: The Lubavitcher's Powerful and Preposterous Messianism", The New Republic, (4 May 1992), pp. 27-35, at 33. Nadler appears to quote from: R. A. Foxbrunner, Habad: The Hasidism of R. Shneur Zalman of Lyady, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, (1992).

Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook wrote in the Twentieth Century that:

"the difference between the Israelite soul. . . and the souls of all non-Jews, no matter what their level, is bigger and deeper than the difference between the human soul and the animal soul."--Y. Sheleg, "A dark reminder of the Dark Ages", Haaretz.com, (28 June 2005).

In an alternative translation:

"The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews--all of them in all different levels--is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle."--A. C. Brownfeld's review of I. Shahak and N. Mezvinsky's book Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel, Pluto Press, London, (1999); in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Volume 19, Number 2, (March, 2000), pp. 105-106, at 105.

The Jewish Encyclopedia wrote in its article "Gentile":

"According to Hananiah b. Akabia the word (Ex. xxi. 14) may perhaps exclude the Gentile; but the shedding of the blood of non-Israelites, while not cognizable by human courts, will be punished by the heavenly tribunal (Mek., Mishpatim, 80b). [***] Another reason for discrimination [against Gentiles] was the vile and vicious character of the Gentiles: 'I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation' ( = 'vile,' 'contemptible'; Deut. xxxii. 21). The Talmud says that the passage refers to the Gentiles of Barbary and Mauretania, who walked nude in the streets (Yeb. 63b), and to similar Gentiles, 'whose flesh is as the flesh of asses and whose issue is like the issue of horses' (Ezek. xxiii. 20); who can not claim a father (Yeb. 98a). The Gentiles were so strongly suspected of unnatural crimes that it was necessary to prohibit the stabling of a cow in their stalls ('Ab. Zarah ii. 1). Assaults on women were most frequent, especially at invasions and after sieges (Ket. 3b), the Rabbis declaring that in case of rape by a Gentile the issue should not be allowed to affect a Jewish woman's relation to her husband. 'The Torah outlawed the issue of a Gentile as that of a beast' (Mik. viii. 4, referring to Ezek. l. c.)."--"Gentile", The Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnalls Company, New York, (1903), pp. 615-626, at 618 and 621.

Albert Einstein's Jewish friend Georg Friedrich Nicolai (Lewinstein) stated in 1917:

"Apart from this strange story of Cain, however, murder is forbidden in the Bible, and very sternly forbidden. But--it is only the murder of Jews. As is natural, considering the period from which it dates, the Bible is absolutely national, in character. Only the Jew is really considered as a human being; cattle and strangers might be slain without the slayer himself being slain. In this case there was a ransom. Accordingly, war was of course allowed also, and the Jews were no more illogical than the Moslem who kills the outlander. Of late years the Jews and the Old Testament have often been reproached for their contempt for those who were not Jews; and in practice even Christ acted in precisely the same way."--G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), p. 531.

In an article "Begin and the 'Beasts'", New Statesman, Volume 103, Number 2674, (25 June 1982), page 12, Amnon Kapeliuk wrote of Menachem Begin, the Prime Minister of Israel:

"The war in Lebanon cannot be interpreted, even by its most devoted proponents in Israel, as a war of survival. For this reason, the government has gone to extraordinary lengths to dehumanise the Palestinians. Begin described them in a speech in the Knesset as 'beasts walking on two legs'. Palestinians have often been called 'bugs' while their refugee camps in Lebanon are referred to as 'tourist camps'. In order to rationalise the bombing of civilian populations, Begin emotively declared: 'If Hitler was sitting in a house with 20 other people, would it be correct to blow up the house?'"--See also: J. Kuttab, "West Bank Arabs Foresee Expulsion", The New York Times, (1 August 1983), p. A15.

This is merely part one, detailing and documenting the racist and genocidal Jewish belief that non-Jews are not human and must be exterminated. I intend to add several more parts covering Jewish beliefs, including the racist and genocidal Jewish beliefs that non-Jews are descended from the Devil, and that non-Jews are the slaves of the Jews.

O'Connell is innocent. If we do not defend his fundamental human right to speak the truth, we are also guilty of his persecution through the cowardly complicity of our silence.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Armenian Weekly's Apologetics for the ADL

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

The Armenian Weekly attacks me with falsehoods for telling the truth about The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians:

An Open Letter to Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs and Khatchig Mouradian of "The Armenian Weekly" Demanding a Retraction, January 17, 2010

The False Opinions of Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs Versus the Demonstrable Facts: The Jewish Belief that Christians Are Idolaters the Jews Must Murder, January 15, 2010

Denial Is the Eighth Stage of Genocide: Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs' Fatally Flawed Apology for the Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, January 13, 2010

The news is reporting that the ADL maintains its opposition to the Armenian Genocide Resolution:

Jewish lobby against "Armenian genocide" resolutions

Jewish Lobby is against so called genocide resolutions

No change in ADL position regarding Armenian issue

Instead of blasting the ADL for using its powerful influence to oppose the Armenian Genocide Resolution, The Armenian Weekly changes the subject to Israeli-Turkish relations in an apology for the ADL:

ADL Concerned about Anti-Jewish Climate in Turkey, Maintains Position on Genocide

Why is The Armenian Weekly more interested in protecting Jewish interests, than Armenian interests?

See also:

Kissing Kosher Ham: Smearmonger Khatchig Mouradian's Conspiracy Theory that the Facts of History Are Somehow "Anti-Semitic" Fabrications, February 13, 2008

Sunday, January 17, 2010

An Open Letter to Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs and Khatchig Mouradian of "The Armenian Weekly" Demanding a Retraction

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs published a personal attack against me in The Armenian Weekly and grossly misrepresented my work, including my book The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians. The Armenian Weekly has thus far failed to retract Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs' numerous falsehoods. In what appears to be an ongoing smear campaign, Khatchig Mouradian, editor of The Armenian Weekly, earlier sought to defame me rather than address the facts presented in my work, as I recorded in my blog article:

Kissing Kosher Ham: Smearmonger Khatchig Mouradian's Conspiracy Theory that the Facts of History Are Somehow "Anti-Semitic" Fabrications, February 13, 2008

See also:

The False Opinions of Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs Versus the Demonstrable Facts: The Jewish Belief that Christians Are Idolaters the Jews Must Murder, January 15, 2010

and,

Denial Is the Eighth Stage of Genocide: Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs' Fatally Flawed Apology for the Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, January 13, 2010

I will here demonstrate the enormous number of direct errors, and errors by omission of relevant facts, in Jacobs' article which compel him to make a retraction, beginning with the title:

"Jacobs: The Outrageous Claim of Christopher Jon Bjerkness: The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians"

My name is spelled "Bjerknes", not "Bjerkness". Jacobs misspelled my name throughout his error ridden article. Jacobs' carelessness as a scholar is evident in even in his title, and it is consistent.

In the first line of his abstract, Jacobs writes:

"According to Swiss-born Canadian conspiracy theorist Henry Makow, author of the antisemitic text Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World (BookSurge Publishing, 2008), [. . .]"

In fact, Henry Makow is a proud Jew, descended from Jews who perished during and as a result of the Holocaust, as Makow, himself, writes:

"I am a non-observant, non-self-hating Canadian Jew who believes in God and Christ's gospel of love. My grandparents all died in the holocaust; my parents narrowly survived by passing as non-Jews. I lived in Israel in 1972-3 but left because Israelis seemed as materialistic as Canadians. Israel also struck me as a country that devoured its own people.

Nevertheless I remained a Zionist until recently when I discovered its hidden imperialist character. Still, I support Israel's existence within the 1967 boundaries, with restitution to the Palestinians. I believe most Israelis and Jews have been hoodwinked as I was."

In the second line of his abstract, Jacobs insults me and attacks my heritage by implying that I have lied about the fact that my maternal grandfather, Nathan Sirkin, was at least half Jewish. Jacobs, who never determined who my grandparents were, as a proper scholar would, instead wrote the insulting and accusatory words:

"Bjerkness[sic], who claims 'Jewish descent' (?),"

In the third line of his abstract, Jacobs again errs when he writes:

"[Bjerknes] is the author of Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist (XTX, 2002, 2,826 pages!), "

In fact, my book Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist is 407 pages. Is it my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein that is 2,825 pages long.

In the second line of his introduction, Jacobs writes:

"[. . .] The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a totally spurious and fraudulent document supposedly telling the story of a secret midnight cemetery meeting of a group of rabbis at which their leader spells out their plans in twenty-four 'protocols' for world take-over."

The Protocols do not purport to be a meeting of rabbis in a cemetery. Jacobs confuses the Protocols with Hermann Goedsche's book Biarritz of 1868, which contained a chapter, "The Jewish Cemetery in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel". Jacobs continues in his errors regarding the Protocols, when he next writes:

"And while the Protocols have been successfully refuted in 1917 in Great Britain, 1934 in Switzerland, and 1993 in Russia, it continues to maintain a life of its own up to and including the present-day on websites and in print. (In 1927, in the United States for example, automobile magnate Henry Ford serialized them in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent and later republished them in a four-volume text entitled The International Jew and still available at these same sites.)"

In his notation to this statement, Jacobs lists himself as a co-author to an article on the Protocols. He should have read them, and if he had, he would have known that there is no mention of rabbis meeting in a graveyard. I am unaware of any refutation of the Protocols in Great Britain in 1917. The first mention I find of the Protocols in Great Britain was in March of 1920, as recorded in the London Times on 8 May 1920, in an article entitled, "The Jewish Peril", which is reproduced in full in my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein at pages 794-797, in which article it states, inter alia:

"In spite of the urgency of impartial and exhaustive criticism, the pamphlet has been allowed, so far, to pass almost unchallenged."

The Times article then appears to lend credence to the Protocols and it was only in successive articles that an attempt was made to refute them, though all such attempts have failed and are mutually contradictory in their assertions. History, above all else, has proved the authenticity of the Jewish and Freemasonic plans outlined in the Protocols.

Jacobs errs by omission when he claims that the Protocols were refuted as if a "forgery" in Switzerland in 1934. Though a corrupt Swiss court made such a decision in 1935, note that the Jewish press reported the decision before it was made, the appellate court then reversed the decision in its entirety on 1 November 1937 [See: L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, Ninth Edition, TBR Books, Washington, D.C., (2000), pp. 107, 263-267. H. de Vries de Heekelingen, Les Protocols des Sages de Sion constituent-ils un faux, Lausanne, (1938)]. Jacobs next refers to the 1993 ruling of a Russian court as if the courts are to be our arbiters of history, which is an absurd posture for a proper scholar to assume.

Contrary to Jacobs' false claims, Henry Ford did not serialize the Protocols in The Dearborn Independent at any time, much less in 1927, at which time Ford was forced by an assassination attempt to end his exposure of World Jewry. The Dearborn Independent began to expose World Jewry in 1920, and it was these articles which appeared in 1920-1922 as The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem.

Jacobs states that he deliberately errs when pronouncing my name, which prompts the question as to how much, if any, of his failed scholarship may instead be deliberate lying, when Jacobs writes:

"Christopher Jon Bjerkness [sic Bjerknes] (b. 1967 [sic 1965]) ('B'yerk-ness,' though I personally prefer to pronounce it with a 'j')"

Rather than providing his own assessment, as a proper scholar would, Jacobs then quotes Henry Makow and known hoaxster and smearmonger Eric Hufschmid at great length in Jacobs' unscholarly ad hominem attack against me. The first line of Jacobs' assessment of my book erroneously states:

"As noted previously, The Jewish Genocide of the Armenian Christian is a massive 574-page PDF document available for downloading and printing from Bjerkness'[sic] website http://www.jewishracism.com/, along with his even more massive Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist (2,826 [sic 407] pages!)."

My book Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist is not available for free download and is not 2,826 pages long.

In a failed mission to find any flaws in my work, Jacobs fabricates reasons to criticize the style, though not even the substance, of my book, when Jacobs writes:

"Additionally, again without attribution, he references, for example, 'well-[sic]intentioned people' (pg. 14), 'many people'[sic] (ibid.), 'many persons' (pg. 15). He also employs such rhetorical devices 'it is a well-known fact that' (pg. 16), 'it appears unquestionable that' (pg. 17) without any source citation whatsoever."

As is perfectly clear in the text of my book, I did not state "many people" on page 15, and my references to "well intentioned people" and "many persons" on pages 14 and 15 are references to articles and letters to the editor published in the London Times, which I not only cite, but which I reproduced in full in the book. Jacobs fabricated a false excuse to criticize my book and wrongfully attributed the statements "It is a well-known fact that" and "It appears unquestionable that" to me, which were in fact made by the Vienna Correspondent to the Times of London, not me. The fact that I did not make these statements, which Jacobs has falsely attributed to me, is quite clear in my book.

Jacobs next misrepresents the contents of my book when he states:

"Early on, he makes the following claim (without any supportive evidence) which appears throughout the text:

Jewish leaders then placed Adolf Hitler in power in the hopes that he would chase the Jews of Europe into Palestine. (pg. 20)"

In fact, I stated on page 227 that the evidence in support of my claims is found in my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, when I wrote:

"When the Jews discovered that emancipation led to assimilation, they imprisoned Napoleon. Napoleon served as the Messianic model for another Zionist dictator, the next pseudo-Messiah to attempt to 'restore the Jews to Palestine', Adolf Hitler. This is explained in detail in my book The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein."

Jacobs hypocritically makes the following assertion without any supportive evidence:

"But they [the Jews whom Jacobs' concedes participated in the Armenian Genocide] were a decided minority and unrepresentative of the overall Turkish Jewish community, despite Bjerkness'[sic] claims."

In his very next line, Jacobs then grossly misrepresents the contents of my book to falsely accuse me of what he has just done in the preceding line of his ad hominem attack:

" Without evidence, he argues that there were six reasons why the Jews of Turkey were 'motivated' to murder Assyrians [sic]:"

The evidence in my book is overwhelming, abundant and compelling, and Jacobs fails throughout his personal attack to address any of it, let alone refute it, as a proper scholar would at least attempt to do. He instead falsely wishes it away, with his fallacy of Petitio Principii of pretending that there can be no evidence because he falsely presumes that there can be no evidence, in spite of the fact that I have presented overwhelming, abundant and compelling proof of my claims, when Jacobs childishly and disingenuously writes:

"(Needless to say, Bjerkness [sic] supplies no supporting evidence for any of these claims because there is no supporting evidence to be had!)"

Having made his irrational, false and disingenuous claim, Jacobs next repeats it to proclaim victory with his inane and patently false declaration:

"[. . .]using as its point of departure the fraudulent claim of the supposed Jewish genocide of Armenian Christians without any documentation to back up his outrageous claims."

The documentation is found throughout my book and Jacobs cannot wish it away with falsehoods.

Jacobs falsely claims that I provided no documentation in support of the factual claim that Talaat Bey and Ataturk were crypto-Jews. Jacobs shamelessly writes:

"Bjerkness [sic] again reminds his readers—without documentation—that both Talaat Bey, the primary architect of the Armenian Genocide, and Kemal Atatürk were both 'crypto-Jews' (pg. 226)."

On page 52 of my book, I quote a letter to the editor of the London Times, which states that Talaat was a Dönmeh:

"Gaster's views concerning Freemasonry in Turkey do not coincide with those held by many Moslems. I need only mention Colonel Sadik Bey and the Committee insurgents, and Sheikh Rashid Ridha. Heaven forbid that I should express an opinion as to which is right. I will merely remark that, according to information which I have received from genuine Freemasons, the majority of the lodges founded under the auspices of the Grand Orient of Turkey since the revolution were, at the outset, avatars of the Committee of Union and Progress, that they have not yet been recognized by British Freemasonry, and that the first ‘Supreme Council' of the G. O. of Turkey appointed in 1909, contained three Jews (Carasso, Cohen, and Faraggi) and three Dönmés (Djavid Bey, S. Kibar, and Osman Talaat)."

Henry Wickham Steed provided an eyewitness account that the CUP was largely Jewish, and stated in his book Through Thirty Years: 1892-1922: A Personal Narrative, Volume One, Doubleday, Page & Company, Garden City, New York, (1924), p. 277, as quoted in my book on pages 218-219:

"TALAAT

In this task he failed. King Ferdinand, the chief culprit, outlived him and was destined to lead his country into yet greater disaster. Meanwhile the Turks, among whom the influence of the—largely Jewish—Committee of Union and Progress was still powerful, were accentuating the ‘national' policy which had provoked the first Balkan War and were dreaming at once pan-Islamic and ‘New Turanian' dreams. Many of the Young Turkish leaders I knew already. Talaat, Minister of the Interior and afterwards Grand Vizir, I had met in Paris in 1909. Others had visited me in Vienna. Upon Talaat I called soon after reaching Constantinople. He received me with almost affectionate cordiality and began at once a magniloquent dissertation upon high politics."

Contrary to Jacobs' false and misleading claims, I also quoted from Marcelle Tinayre's article in L'Illustration in December of 1923, which was translated into English and published as "Saloniki", The Living Age, Volume 320, Number 4156, (1 March 1924), pp. 417-421; as follows from page 223 of my book:

"The deunmehs of to-day, affiliated with Free Masonry, instructed in Occidental universities, often professing total atheism, have given leaders to the Young Turk revolution. Talaat Bey, Djavid Bey, and many other members of the Committee of Union and Progress were deunmehs from Saloniki. "

At page 224 of my book, I provided still further proof of the fact that Talaat was a Jew, by quoting Inspector-General of the Turkish Forces in Armenia and Military Governor of Egyptian Sinai during the First World War, Rafael De Nogales, from his book Four Years Beneath the Crescent, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, (1926):

"That was the renegade Hebrew (donme) of Salonika, Talaat, the principal organizer of the massacres and deportations, who, fishing in muddy waters, succeeded in raising himself from the humble rank of postal clerk to that of Grand Vizier of the Empire."

Contrary to Jacobs' patently false claim that I provided no proof of the fact that Ataturk was a Jew, on page 65 of my book, I quoted two sources as follows:

"According to an article by Hillel Halkin entitled, 'When Kemal Ataturk Recited Shema Yisrael: 'It's My Secret Prayer, Too,' He Confessed', which appeared in the Forward of New York, on 28 January 1994, Mustafa Kemal 'Atatürk' stated that he was not only Jewish, but that he was a descendant of the false Jewish messiah Shabbatai Zevi. Mustafa Kemal 'Atatürk' is quoted as having said,

'I'm a descendant of Sabbetai Zevi—not indeed a Jew any more, but an ardent admirer of this prophet of yours. My opinion is that every Jew in this country would do well to join his camp.'

Gershom Scholem wrote in his book Kabbalah, that Djavid Bey was descended from the false Jewish messiah Baruchyah Russo,

'Their liturgies were written in a very small format so that they could easily be hidden. All the sects concealed their internal affairs from Jews and Turks so successfully that for a long time knowledge of them was based only on rumor and upon reports of outsiders. Doenmeh manuscripts revealing details of their Shabbatean ideas were brought to light and examined only after several of the Doenmeh families decided to assimilate completely into Turkish society and transmitted their documents to friends among the Jews of Salonika and Izmir. As long as the Doenmeh were concentrated in Salonika, the sect's institutional framework remained intact, although several Doenmeh members were active in the Young Turks' movement which originated in that city. The first administration that came to power after the Young Turk revolution (1909) included three ministers of Doenmeh origin, including the minister of finance, Djavid Bey, who was a descendant of the Baruchiah Russo family and served as one of the leaders of his sect. One assertion that was commonly made by many Jews of Salonika (denied however, by the Turkish government) was that Kemal Atatürk was of Doenmeh origin. This view was eagerly embraced by many of Atatürk's religious opponents in Anatolia.'"

On page 213, I quoted from an article"Sabbatean Messianism as Proto-Secularism: Examples in Modern Turkey and Zionism" by Prof. M. Avrum Ehrlich, found in the book, M. Tütüncü, Editor, Turkish-Jewish Encounters: Studies on Turkish-Jewish Relations Through the Ages = Türk-Yahudi Bulusmalari: Tarihte Türk-Yahudi Iliskileri Arastirmalari, SOTA, Haarlem, (2001), pp. 273-306:

"Rumours were always extant that key activists in the revolution were of Dönme stock; even Atatürk was alleged by some to have Dönme ancestry37. It was via the Masonic lodges that the Dönme, the Jews, Bektashi and secularists who were less accepted in mainstream society were able to meet on an equal footing, many of them becoming major instruments of the revolution."

On page 226 of my book, I quoted from the article "The Sort of Man Mustafa Kemal Is", The Literary Digest, Volume 75, Number 2, Whole Number 1695, (14 October 1922), pp. 50, 52-53, at 50:

"A SPANISH JEW BY ANCESTRY, an orthodox Moslem by birth and breeding, trained in a German war college, a patriot, a student of the campaigns of the world's great generals, including Napoleon, Grant and Lee—these are said to be a few outstanding characteristics in the personality of the new ‘Man on Horseback' who has appeared in the Near East. He is a real dictator, the correspondents testify, a man of the type which is at once the hope and fear of nations torn to pieces by unsuccessful wars. Unity and power have come back to Turkey largely through the will of Mustafa Kemal Pasha. No one has yet, it appears, referred to him as the ‘Napoleon of the Near East,' but some enterprising journalist will probably do it sooner or later; for Kemal's way of rising into power, his methods at once autocratic and carefully considered, even his military tactics, are said to resemble those of Napoleon."

Contrary to Jacobs' falsehoods, on page 217 of my book, I quoted Joachim Prinz's book The Secret Jews, Random House, New York, (1973), p. 122, which stated that Ataturk was a Jew:

"The revolt of the Young Turks in 1908 against the authoritarian regime of Sultan Abdul Hamid began among the intellectuals of Salonika. It was from there that the demand for a constitutional regime originated. Among the leaders of the revolution which resulted in a more modern government in Turkey were Djavid Bey and Mustafa Kemal. Both were ardent doenmehs. Djavid Bey became minister of finance; Mustafa Kemal became the leader of the new regime and he adopted the name of Atatürk. His opponents tried to use his doenmeh background to unseat him, but without success. Too many of the Young Turks in the newly formed revolutionary Cabinet prayed to Allah, but had as their real prophet Shabtai Zvi, the Messiah of Smyrna"

So much for Jacobs' oft repeated and highly deceitful claims that I provided no evidence in support of my claims.

In addition to other erroneous claims, Jacobs states when addressing my writings on the Rothschild family:

"[. . .]their employment of a 'Jewish actor (not true!) named John Wilkes Booth' to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln (14 April 1865) because of Lincoln's opposition to their plans (pg. 242), [ . . .]"

Jacobs hypocritically fails to cite any source for his false claim that Booth was not Jewish, while elsewhere falsely claiming that I have failed to provide evidence in support of my contentions when I have in fact provided voluminous proof of The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians. In point of fact, John Wilkes Booth was a Jewish actor. As but one source of countless to be had, I will quote a contemporary biographical account of the man found in The Life, Crime and Capture of John Wilkes Booth by George Alfred Townsend, at page 21, where John Wilkes Booth's father is described,

"The elder Booth in every land was a sojourner, as all his fathers were. Of Hebrew descent, and by a line of actors, he united in himself that strong Jewish physiognomy which, in its nobler phases, makes all that is dark and beautiful, and the combined vagrancy of all men of genius and all men of stage."

Jacobs yet again misrepresents my book, which provides an immense amount of documentation proving Rothschild power, when Jacobs disingenuously writes:

"The only proof that Bjernkness [sic] can muster to support his notion of Rothschild power is the fact that the British Balfour Declaration of 2 November 1917 was in the form of a letter from the Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour (1848-1930) to Baron Walter Rothschild (1868-1937), a leader of the Jewish community of Great Britain, declaring His Majesty's Government's 'declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations' towards 'the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.' (Balfour also noted his appreciation in the letter that its contents be shared with the Zionist Federation.)"

I will perhaps address the many errors in Jacobs' notations at a later date.

If Jacobs and The Armenian Weekly fail to retract their many published false statements after receiving notice that they are false, then the ongoing publication of these known falsehoods will be an act of deliberate deception of the public.

To demonstrate the dangers of Jacobs' misrepresentations of the facts, I will quote from the London Times, "THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES: EXTERMINATING A RACE: A RECORD OF HORRORS", which was published on 8 October 1915, on page 5:

"The attempts of the American Ambassador to procure some alleviation of the lot of Armenians have thus far proved unsuccessful. Mr Morganthau, in the opinion of good observers, wasted too much diplomatic energy on behalf of the Zionists of Palestine, who were in no danger of massacre, to have any force to spare. Talaat and Bedri simply own that persecuting Armenians amuses them and turn a deaf ear to American pleadings. German and Austro-Hungarian residents in Turkey at first approved of the punishment of Armenian ‘traitors', but the methods of the Turkish extremists have sickened even Prussian stomachs. True the Jewish Baron von Oppenheim, now in Syria, has been preaching massacre, and the German Consular officials al Aleppo and Alexandretta have followed suit, perhaps with the idea of planting German colonists in the void left by the disappearance of the Armenians when the war is over."

Note that Morgenthau, who it is often claimed was a Jewish hero of the Armenian Genocide, was in fact a Zionist opportunist who helped to perpetuate the massacres, as were those "Germans" who are often scapegoated for the Jewish crime, those "Germans" who were in fact International Jews.

cc: Khatchig Mouradian

khatchigm@hotmail.com

http://www.armenianweekly.com/author/khatchigmouradian/

Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs

sjacobs@bama.ua.edu

http://web.as.ua.edu/rel/jacobs.html

See also:

The Armenian Weekly's Apologetics for the ADL, January 19, 2010

The False Opinions of Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs Versus the Demonstrable Facts: The Jewish Belief that Christians Are Idolaters the Jews Must Murder, January 15, 2010

Denial Is the Eighth Stage of Genocide: Dr. Steven Leonard Jacobs' Fatally Flawed Apology for the Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, January 13, 2010