Saturday, February 20, 2016

Bradley R. Smith of CODOH Has Passed Away

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I wish to express my condolences to the family and friends of Bradley R. Smith. I first became acquainted with his work when he appeared on the Phil Donahue show back in 1994. Donahue was quite popular in Chicago and paved the way for Oprah Winfrey. Here is the first part of the show:

I was outraged when David Irving was arrested in 2005 in Austria for thought and speech crimes. The very same day the authorities took him into custody, I sent off an article in defense of Irving to Bradley R. Smith, which he immediately published that same day:

Free Speech, Free David Irving

Rest in peace, Mr. Smith, and thank you for your decades of service!

The Jewish Saint Bernie Sanders: Everyone Takes a Beating, But the Benign Bolshevik Bernie

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Washington Post and the Huffington Post publish article after article attacking Donald Trump, and google news and yahoo news link to many of these articles. The press has leveled far worse attacks on Trump than any other candidate. These attacks are more severe both in terms of numbers and degree. The coverage is also disproportionately negative towards Trump than the others, with fewer positive things said about him. The thumbs of the press are definitely trying to tip the scales against Trump in every way they can.

The press is also going after Clinton and Cruz. It is now clear why the Democratic field was so poor from the start. It was the only way the jews could leave communist Bernie Sanders the last man standing after pulling the rug out from under Clinton's campaign.

US Congressman Oscar Callaway revealed in 1917 that the Money Trust was buying up key newspapers in order to hold sway over public opinion and drive us into war against Germany. Callaway's statement is recorded in the Congressional Record for 9 February 1917,

"Mr. CALLAWAY. Mr. Chairman, under unanimous consent, I insert in the Record at this point a statement showing the newspaper combination, which explains their activity in this war matter, just discussed by the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Moore]:

'In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and a sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.

'These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.

'This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations as to the present condition of the United States Army and Navy, and the possibility and probability of the United States being attacked by foreign foes.

'This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served. The effectiveness of this scheme has been conclusively demonstrated by the character of stuff carried in the daily press throughout the country since March 1915. They have resorted to anything necessary to commercialize public sentiment and sandbag the National Congress into making extravagant and wasteful appropriations for the Army and Navy under the false pretense that it was necessary. Their stock argument is that it is 'patriotism.' They are playing on every prejudice and passion of the American people.'"--Congressional Record: Containing the Proceedings and Debates of the Second Session of the Sixty-Fourth Congress of the United States, Volume 54, Part 3, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., (27 January 1917-12 February 1917), pp. 2946-2948.

The press deliberately covered up the atrocities of Trotsky, Stalin and the Bolsheviks of the Soviet Empire, aiding and abetting the genocide of tens of millions of the best genetic material of Eastern Europe. The press relentlessly attacked Sen. Joseph McCarthy and brought to an end his purge of communists from the Federal Government of the United States. The press undermined America's war against communism in Vietnam.

Today, the press is attacking every Presidential candidate except the jewish saint and communist Bernie Sanders. Today, the press is savaging Donald Trump.

Trump has promised to fight back against communist China and work towards regime change in communist North Korea. Trump has pledged to bring to an end the communist goal of internationalizing the United States and has promised to restore our national sovereignty.

Friday, February 19, 2016

Trump Ought to Follow Suit with a Lawsuit of His Own

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Lawrence Joyce has filed suit against Ted Cruz alleging that he is ineligible to become President of the United States of America due to the fact that Cruz is not a natural born citizen, but was instead born in Canada. Donald Trump ought to file a similar suit in the appropriate jurisdiction, then submit a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court to hear the case immediately on the grounds that it is an urgent matter of national importance, that only the US Supreme Court has the authority to rule on the issue and is therefore the court of proper jurisdiction, and that a national standard must be set by the highest court because lower courts may issue contradictory opinions, and the matter must be settled with a final standard for all the land.

Let the Supreme Court show its political stripes. Let Cruz squirm under the pressure.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

The KGB POPE: How Dare the Communist-Jesuit Pope Francis Interfere in American Internal Politics During an Election!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

At a crucial moment in our struggle to survive as Americans in our American nation, the Jesuit bolshevik Pope Francis has interjected himself into our political process by declaring with his papal authority that Donald Trump is not a Christian merely because Trump seeks to defend our laws, our sovereignty and our borders. It was a scandal when J. F. Kennedy ran for President. Given that Kennedy was a Catholic, many Americans feared he would serve under the influence of the Pope.

This bolshevik thug, Pope Francis, has now excommunicated our Republican front runner in the Presidential race from Christendom, and declared it an heresy to be a patriotic American. All the worst fears Americans have had about Catholics, and most especially Jesuits, have now been made flesh and deeds by this communist criminal.

In a previous article, I demonstrated that the Russian Orthodox has been completely taken over by the KGB:

Putin's KGB Crew Exposed, March 17, 2014

I have been warning for a decade about the dangers Christian Zionists, who are firmly under jewish control, pose to America and the World. We can now add the Pope of Rome to the list of our jewish controlled Christian enemies, who relentlessly interfere in our political process, much to our detriment.

This Jesuit bolshevik is also opening up the Roman Catholic Church to the KGB controlled Russian Orthodox Church. Communist Pope Francis met Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill in communist Cuba.

Here is my above referenced article on the KGB communist subversion of the Russian Orthodox Church to render it anti-Western and pro-communist:

KGB Putin's apologists in the West attempt to portray him as if he were antijew and opposed to the Jew World Order, based on the false assumption that Putin's ostentatious gay bashing and sponsorship of the Orthodox Church prove that he is deliberately working against the interests of international jewry. I have already exposed the fact that KGB Putin's gay bashing is in keeping with long standing Soviet policy, as proof that Putin perpetuates the Jew World Order Soviet Union, and that the Soviet Union only appeared to dissolve so as to fool the West into lowering its guard and giving up its secrets and monies to the Soviets:

Putin's Communist Gay Bashing and Its Antifascist Roots, March 07, 2014

In the following article, I exposed the fact that Putin is using the Orthodox Church to foment a Christian Communist church to provide the dialectical alternative to Christian Zionism and provide the basis for the growth of the Soviet Union to include Greece:

The Reds Want to Foment World War III as a Christian Communist Versus Christian Zionist Battle of the Fanatics, March 03, 2014

An article by Scott Greer in The Daily Caller provides a first hand account of the KGB's infiltration of the Orthodox Church and an assessment that Putin is using this KGB influence to expand his empire:

"'About five years ago, Pacepa was warning me about Putin. He's saying Putin is former KGB, Putin has surrounded himself with KGB people everywhere, it is now in essence an ‘intelligence agency dictatorship',' Rychlak, a professor at the University of Mississippi School of Law, told TheDC. [***] In Rychlak's opinion, Russian agencies have subverted the institutions that Eastern Ukrainians rely on for information and has caused some of them to support Putin's interests by demanding Russian annexation.

'All of their news has been filtered through Russian sources and even their church has been infiltrated. Their sources of information for at least a decade and maybe much longer than that, have been controlled,' the law professor explained. 'They have been cultivated and shaped and controlled through Moscow.'

One of the most damning accusations that Rychlak levels at Putin's security apparatus is that it has infiltrated and influenced the Russian Orthodox Church to promote the interests of the Kremlin.

'Dating back to the 1960s, the Kremlin began sending agents into the Russian Orthodox Church, and a lot of those people have filtered up to higher levels. The Russians put people into these churches, knowing they were agents, hoping they would develop into influential positions, and many of them have,' Rychlak continued. 'The church has been tainted, as other churches have been under Soviet domination.' [***] The book 'Disinformation' points out that Soviet intelligence agencies frequently worked with left-wing Westerners, such as the anti-war movement against Vietnam, to further the cause of the USSR. According to Rychlak, the current Russian government still uses the Left for that purpose, as he claims that their ideology isn't too far removed from that of the old Soviet regime.

'You still have folks around the globe, some of whom actively collaborate with the Soviet-Marxist ideology that we still see from Putin. Others who are maybe not intentionally collaborate, what you would call willing dupes, who go along with it,' the 'Disinformation' co-author said."--Scott Greer, "Former Soviet spy chief claims Putin regime is an ‘intelligence agency dictatorship'", The Daily Caller, (7 March 2014).

The above quotation makes note of the fact that numerous dissidents support KGB Putin. I have for many years been informing my readers that Ayn Rand was a Trust controlled opposition agent of the Soviet Union and that libertarians and objectivists are closet communists subverting America and promoting Putin. This book written in 1984 by a KGB insider details how the Soviets previously tried to appear weak so that they could infiltrate the West, cause the West to lower its guard, and deceive the West into believing the Soviet Union had collapsed from within when it had not:

Anatole Golitsyn, The New Lies for Old Ones

Beginning at page 291 and continuing through to page 294, Golitsyn recounts how the KGB subverted and used the Orthodox Church to turn it against the West, though it had always previously been pro-Western, and make it a tool of the communists against the West:

"A special word needs to be said on the exploitation of religion and leading churchmen in the communist world for strategic political purposes.

In November-December 1960 the Patriarch of All Russia, Aleksiy, an old KGB agent, accompanied by Metropolitan Nikodim, head of the Russian Orthodox Church's International Department, and Professor Uspenskiy of the Leningrad Faculty of Theology and an active member of the Soviet Peace Committee, toured the Middle East in an aircraft provided by the Soviet government.12 In the course of the tour Patriarch Aleksiy and the Syrian patriarch issued an official communique that stated: 'Our standpoint of Christian love compels us to condemn everything which incites hatred among peoples and impels mankind toward a new world war and to bless any attempts aimed at creating peace between peoples and nations. . . . We resolutely condemn any manifestation of colonialism as foreign to the spirit and the letter of the law of God.'13 [***] The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia recorded that by 1972 the World Council of Churches had been converted from a 'pro-Western' to a 'progressive' orientation in its policies on peace, disarmament, and related matters. Assiduous advocacy by the Christian Peace Conference and others of the view that Christianity and communism were natural allies in support of the national liberation movement induced the World Council of Churches to provide funds for African guerrilla movements, including the Rhodesian Patriotic Front, believed to be responsible for a massacre of British missionaries in 1978."

Golitsyn reveals the machinations of the "Trust" and the NEP in pages 10- 17. I will quote these passages at length, because they reveal also what Putin and his apologists are doing today, i.e. denying that the Soviet Union exists, infiltrating anticommunist movements, stealing all the West has to offer while subverting the West, only to strengthen the Soviet Union for an unprecedented comeback and rise to World dominating power:

"The pattern of disinformation used during the implementation of a long-range policy may be called the 'weakness and evolution' pattern, or the pattern of 'calculated ideological moderation.' Its aim is to calm the fears of the adversaries of international communism by understating real communist strength and to confound the policies of those adversaries by masking the realities of communist policy. When following this pattern, therefore, disinformation reflects real or imaginary weaknesses, splits, and crises in the communist world and projects an image of evolution away from an ideological toward a conventional, national system. The intention is that the nations of the noncommunist world, accepting the alleged disunity and evolution of the communist world as genuine, will fail to respond effectively to communist offensive strategy and, in their confusion, will be induced to make practical miscalculations and mistakes in their dealings with the communist world. The major role of disinformation in the weakness and evolution pattern is to conceal and misrepresent the real nature, objectives, tactics, and techniques of communist policy. [***] The weakness and evolution pattern was used successfully by Lenin in the 1920s. In 1921 Soviet Russia faced imminent collapse. Industry lay ruined by the war; agriculture was in crisis. The Russian people, disillusioned by the rigid policy of 'war communism,' were on the brink of revolt; the policy of terror was proving ineffective; there were peasant uprisings in Siberia and along the Volga; nationalist movements in the Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, and Central Asia were openly proclaiming separatism and posed a serious threat to national unity; the sailors at the Kronstadt Naval Base revolted. Abroad, the hopes of world revolution had faded after communist defeats in Germany, Poland, and Hungary. The major European powers, although not united, were individually hostile to communism and to the new Soviet state; a huge Russian emigre movement, spread across Europe, was plotting the overthrow of the regime. Soviet Russia was in complete political and economic isolation.

It was in this situation, facing a highly unfavorable balance of power vis-a-vis the West, that Lenin conceived and launched a longrange policy that, over the following eight years, was to show spectacular success. It was given the deliberately misleading title of the New Economic Policy, or NEP. In fact, it ranged far beyond the economy, defining also the principal political and ideological objectives and tactics for the regime internally and externally and the strategy for the international communist movement. Within the terms of the NEP, the Soviet leaders were to eliminate separatism by creating a federation of national republics, the USSR. They were to introduce national long-term economic planning. They were to plan and build an electric power system to cover and bind together the whole country. They were to start to change the world balance of power in communist favor.

To the world at large, the NEP meant that foreign industrialists were offered concessions in Soviet industry and invited to open businesses in Soviet Russia; that Soviet industrial enterprises were to be reorganized as trusts and operated on a profit basis; that smaller enterprises and properties could be owned by cooperatives or private individuals; that money was back in use and private trade permitted; that restrictions on travel were relaxed; that emigres were encouraged to return under amnesty, while some Soviet citizens were allowed to emigrate; and that Soviet diplomacy was seeking peaceful coexistence with the West.

The Soviet leaders saw it differently. They intended that the NEP would not only bring about economic recovery, but would also serve to prevent internal revolt, expand foreign trade, attract foreign capital and expertise, gain diplomatic recognition from non-communist countries, prevent major conflict with the Western powers, help to exploit the contradictions in and between the capitalist countries, neutralize the emigre movement, and help to promote world revolution through the communist movement.

Lenin believed that this fundamentally aggressive and ideological policy could prove effective if it was accompanied by the systematic use of misrepresentation and deception, or, to use the current word, disinformation. The characteristics of this disinformation were an apparent moderation in communist ideology, the avoidance of references to violence in communist methods, the exaggeration of the degree of the restoration of capitalism in Soviet Russia, the use of a sober and businesslike style in diplomatic and commercial negotiations with the West, and emphasis on disarmament and peaceful coexistence. All of this was intended to induce the belief in the outside world that the communist system was weak and losing its revolutionary ardor. Left to itself, it would either disintegrate or come to terms with the capitalist system.

The Soviet security service was reorganized, renamed the OGPU, and given new political tasks. It was directed to mount disinformation and political operations. False opposition movements were set up and controlled secretly by the OGPU. They were designed to attract to their ranks genuine opponents of the regime inside and outside the country. These innocent persons could then be used by the regime in various ways. They could act as channels for disinformation; they could be blackmailed and recruited as agents; they could be arrested and given public trials. A characteristic, but not unique, example of this technique is provided by the so-called 'Trust' operation. In 1921, as the NEP was being launched, the OGPU created inside Soviet Russia a false anti-Soviet organization, the Monarchist Alliance of Central Russia. It had once been a genuine organization, founded by Czarist generals in Moscow and Leningrad but liquidated by the Soviet security service in 1919-20. Former members of this organization, among them Czarist generals and members of the old aristocracy who had come over to the Soviet side, nominally led the movement. Their new loyalty to the Soviet regime was not in doubt, for they had betrayed their former friends in the anticommunist underground. They were the Czarist generals Brusilov and Zaynchkovskiy; the Czarist military attache in Yugoslavia, General Potapov; and the Czarist transport official Yakushev. The most active agent in the Trust was a former intelligence officer of the General Staff in Czarist Russia whose many names included Opperput. Agents of the Trust traveled abroad and established confidential contact with genuine anticommunist emigre leaders in order (ostensibly) to coordinate activity against the Soviet regime. Among the important emigres they met were Boris Savinkov and Generals Wrangel and Kutepov.

These agents confided in their contacts that the anti-Soviet monarchist movement that they represented was now well established in Soviet Russia, had penetrated into the higher levels of the army, the security service, and even the government, and would in time take power and restore the monarchy. They convinced the emigre leaders that the regime had undergone a radical change. Communism had completely failed; ideology was dead; the present leaders had nothing in common with the fanatical revolutionaries of the past. They were nationalists at heart, and their regime was evolving into a moderate, national regime and might soon collapse. The NEP should be seen as the first important concession on the road to restoring capitalism in Russia. Soon political concessions would follow. Because of this, said the Trust agents, any intervention or gesture of hostility from the European powers or the emigre movements would be ill-advised, if not tragic, since it would only unite the Russian people around their government and so extend its survival. The European governments and the emigre leaders should put a stop to anti-Soviet terrorist activities and change their attitude from hostility toward the Soviet regime to one of passive acceptance. They should grant diplomatic recognition and increase trade. In this way they would have a better opportunity to contribute to the evolutionary process. The emigre leaders should return to Russia to make their contribution. Naturally there were doubters among the emigres, but the prestige of the leaders of the organization (particularly, of General Brusilov) convinced the majority. They accepted at face value the Trust's disinformation and passed it on to their influential friends in the European intelligence services. By the time it had been circulated to governments as 'secret' intelligence it sounded most impressive, and when as time went on the same story was confirmed by source after source, it became 'secret and reliable.' The intelligence services of Europe were committed and it was unthinkable that they could all be wrong.

While the Trust was thriving the OGPU took control, wholly or partially, of two other movements calculated to influence the political climate in support of the NEP. They were the 'Change of Signposts' movement and the 'Eurasian' movement. The first was used by the Soviet security service to mislead emigres and intellectuals in Europe into believing that the strength of communist ideology was on the wane and that the Soviet regime was evolving into a more moderate, national state. The movement published, with unofficial government assistance, a weekly magazine in Prague and Paris, The Change of Signposts, and in Berlin a paper, On the Eve. In 1922, at some risk, the Soviet government allowed two magazines to be published in Leningrad and Moscow, New Russia and Russia. They were intended to exert a similar influence on intellectuals inside the country.

By 1926 all publications of the Change of Signposts movement had been wound up, the movement disbanded, and some of its leaders in the Soviet Union arrested. An official Soviet publication partially confirms the exploitation of the movement and describes its end. Shortly afterward, operation Trust was terminated with the arrest of those opponents of the regime who had been unwise enough to reveal themselves as such by associating with the Trust. The NEP was officially ended by Stalin in 1929 with what was called 'a socialist offensive on all fronts.' The concessions to foreign industrialists were canceled; private enterprise in the Soviet Union was prohibited; private property was confiscated; agriculture was collectivized; repression of political opposition was intensified. The NEP might never have been.

The Results of the NEP

Agriculture, industry, and trade all improved dramatically under the NEP. Although the NEP failed to attract large credits from the West, it brought technology and efficient new equipment. Thousands of Western technicians helped to industrialize the Soviet Union, and Western firms built essential factories there. It is fair to say that the foundations of Soviet heavy and military industry were laid in the 1920s with American, British, Czechoslovak, and, after the Treaty of Rapallo (1922), German help. Germany played an especially significant role in the Soviet militarization. According to the secret clauses of the treaty, Germans helped to build modern aviation and tank factories in the USSR. Communists spoke cynically of foreign concessionaires and businessmen as 'assistants of socialism.' Longrange planning and industrialization were launched. De jure recognition of the Soviet Union by the West helped the regime to neutralize internal opposition and so to stabilize itself politically. The remnants of other political parties (Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, Zionists) were suppressed, liquidated, or exiled. The peasants were pacified. The independence of the churches was broken and new, controlled 'living churches' accepted the regime. The nationalist and separatist movements in Georgia, the Ukraine, Armenia, and the Asian republics were crushed and their nations fully incorporated into the federal union. No new organized political opposition to the regime emerged during the NEP. Regular purges of communist party membership kept ideological purity intact; a minority of members succumbed to the temptations of capitalism and were expelled. The party and security service gained experience in activist methods and in controlling contacts with the West. The security service began to exercise effective control over Soviet society.

The European bloc that it was anticipated would be formed against the Soviet Union did not materialize. De jure recognition was granted by all major countries except the USA. The Russian emigre movement was successfully penetrated, discredited, and left to disintegrate. The Treaty of Rapallo, signed with Germany in 1922 (the crowning achievement of Lenin's activist diplomacy), raised Soviet prestige, helped to increase Soviet military strength, precluded a united anticommunist front in Europe, and weakened the Weimar Republic.

Between 1921 and 1929 twelve new communist parties joined the Comintern, bringing the total to forty-six. By the use of legal tactics, communist parties increased their influence in trade unions and parliaments. Though the bid to form a united front with the Socialist Internationals failed, some socialist parties—the German, French, Spanish, and Czechoslovak—split under the influence of the communist approach; the left-wing groups joined communist parties or formed new ones. Valuable experience was gained by the Comintern in the simultaneous use of revolutionary as well as legal tactics, in its readiness to switch from the one to the other, and in its ability to coordinate with Soviet diplomacy. United front tactics were successfully used by the communists in Nationalist China. Mongolia became the first Soviet satellite.

The Lesson of the NEP

The disinformation of the NEP period had been successful. Seen through Western eyes, the threat of communism under the NEP seemed to have become diffused. Fear of Bolshevism waned. The position of anticommunists was undermined. Expectations of rapprochement were aroused. The Western public, reluctant to make sacrifices, urged their governments toward further accommodation with the Soviet regime. In reality, of course, the challenge of communism had been reinforced: Western expectations were later to be rudely shattered. But the communist strategists had learned the lesson that Western leaders could be deceived and induced to make mistakes in their assessments of, and policy toward, the Soviet Union. Disinformation had in fact created favorable conditions for the success of Soviet internal policy, activist diplomacy, and Comintern activity."

We have a right to ask, is Ron Paul KGB? Is Obama? Is Merkel?

See also my articles:

Putin's Communist Gay Bashing and Its Antifascist Roots, March 07, 2014

The Reds Want to Foment World War III as a Christian Communist Versus Christian Zionist Battle of the Fanatics, March 03, 2014

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Jeff Rense Interviewed Christopher Jon Bjerknes, 9 February 2016

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Jeff Rense was not only kind enough to interview me on his program on 9 February 2016, he has posted two videos derived from the interview!

Jeff Rense & Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Einstein Exposed...Biggest Physics Fraud Ever?

Jeff Rense & Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Einstein The Liar & The Zionist Plot

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Albert Einstein, Ilse Einstein, Georg Nicolai and Their Anti-White Orgies

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In his 1917 book The Biology of War, Albert Einstein's friend Georg Friedrich Nicolai (Lewinstein) revealed the fact that jews equate Whites to cattle and feel justified in murdering Whites,

"Apart from this strange story of Cain, however, murder is forbidden in the Bible, and very sternly forbidden. But--it is only the murder of Jews. As is natural, considering the period from which it dates, the Bible is absolutely national, in character. Only the Jew is really considered as a human being; cattle and strangers might be slain without the slayer himself being slain. In this case there was a ransom. Accordingly, war was of course allowed also, and the Jews were no more illogical than the Moslem who kills the outlander. Of late years the Jews and the Old Testament have often been reproached for their contempt for those who were not Jews; and in practice even Christ acted in precisely the same way."[1]

Nicolai (Lewinstein) maintained that it was obvious to all that the jews are a master race, superior to Whites,

"Europe, at all events, is an absolute national medley, and any one who does not consider the Jews the flower of the human race should not make such foolish assertions as that concerning the superiority of unmixed races."[ibid p. 276]

Georg Nicolai was young Ilse Einstein's lover. Else Einstein was his patient and he bed her daughter, Ilse, despite the fact that he was much older than she was. After taking her for himself, Nicolai encouraged Ilse, aged 20, to succumb to Albert Einstein's sexual advances towards her and marry him. At the time, Ilse rejected Albert's desire to fornicate with her and refused to marry him. Albert Einstein, aged 39, had already engaged in a lengthy incestuous and adulterous relationship with Ilse Einstein's mother Else, who was Albert's cousin through both his mother and his father. Having been rejected by Ilse, Albert married Else and thereby had the full "small harem" all to himself.[2]

Einstein wrote to Max Born, in an undated letter thought to have been written sometime between 24 June 1918 and 2 August 1918,

"We are well, and the small harem eat well and are thriving."[3]

Philipp Frank wrote,

"Einstein's wife Elsa died in 1936. [***] Of Einstein's two stepdaughters, one died after leaving Germany; the other, Margot, a talented sculptress, was divorced from her husband and now lives mostly with Einstein in Princeton."[4]

Even this "small harem" might not have been enough for Albert Einstein. There are reasons to believe he had an affair with Elsa Einstein's sister, Paula, another of Albert Einstein's cousins.[5] Einstein's son, Hans Albert Einstein, believed that his father was also having an affair with his secretary Helen Dukas.[6]

Albert Einstein admitted on 23 December 1918 ,

"It is correct that I committed adultery. I have been living together with my cousin, Elsa Einstein, divorced Löwenthal, for about 4 1/2 years and have been continuing these intimate relations since then."[7]

Dismayed, Ilse Einstein wrote to Georg Nicolai about Albert Einstein's sexual advances toward her,

"I have never wished nor felt the least desire to be close to [Albert Einstein] physically. This is otherwise in his case--recently at least.--He himself even admitted to me once how difficult it is for him to keep himself in check."[8]

Georg Nicolai (Lewinstein) wanted to dissolve Europe into a pan-European Union with the First World War serving a pretext, and his statement declaring these internationalist views, which Albert Einstein endorsed, evinces that one of the reasons why the jews started the First World War was to dissolve European nations out of existence as if such were the only way to achieve peace, peace which can actually only be achieved when we stop the jews from instigating wars. The other primary reason why the jews instigated World War I was to wrest Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.

Georg Nicolai presented the proposition for what was to become the jews' European Union, and Albert Einstein signed on:

"A Manifesto to Europeans

Technical science and intercommunication are clearly tending to force us to recognize the fact that international relations exist, and consequently that a world-embracing civilization exists. Yet never has any previous war caused so complete an interruption of that coöperation which should exist between civilized nations. It may, of course, be that the reason why we are so profoundly impressed by this is only that we were already united by so many ties the severing of which is painful.

That such a state of things should exist must not astonish us. Nevertheless, those who care in the slightest degree for this universal world civilization are under a twofold obligation to strive for the maintenance of these principles. Those who might have been expected to care for such things, in particular men of science and art, have hitherto almost invariably confined their utterances to a hint that the present suspension of direct relations coincided with the cessation of any desire for their continuance.

Such feelings are not to be excused by any national passions. They are unworthy of what every one has hitherto understood by civilization, and it would be a misfortune indeed were they generally to prevail among persons of culture; and not only a misfortune for civilization, but, we are firmly convinced, a misfortune for the very purpose for which, after all, in the last resort all the present hell was let loose--the national existence of the different countries.

Technical achievement has made the world smaller, and to-day the countries of that large peninsula Europe seem brought as near to one another as the cities of each individual small Mediterranean peninsula used to be; and Europe--it might almost be said the world--is already one and indivisible, owing to its multitudinous associations.

Hence it must be the duty of educated and philanthropic Europeans to make, at any rate, an effort lest Europe, owing to her not being sufficiently strongly welded together, should suffer the same tragic fate as ancient Greece. Is Europe gradually to be exhausted by fratricidal war and perish?

The war raging at present will scarcely end in a victory for any one, but probably only in defeat. Consequently, it would seem that educated men in all countries not only should, but absolutely must, exert all their influence to prevent the conditions of peace being the source of future wars, and this no matter what the present uncertain issue of the conflict may be. Above all must they direct their efforts to seeing that advantage is taken of the fact that this war has thrown all European conditions, as it were, into a melting-pot, to mold Europe into one organic whole, for which both technical and intellectual conditions are ripe.

This is not the place to discuss how this new European order is to be brought about. We desire only to assert in principle that we are firmly convinced of the time having come for all Europe to be united together, in order to protect her soil, her inhabitants, and her civilization.

Believing as we do that the desire for such a state of things is latent in many minds, we are anxious that it should everywhere find expression and thus become a force; and with this end in view it seems to us before all else necessary that there should be a union of all in any way attached to European civilization; that is to say, who are what Goethe once almost prophetically called 'good Europeans.' We must never abandon hope that their collective pronouncement may be heard by some one even amidst the clash of arms, most especially if the 'good Europeans' of to-morrow include all those who are esteemed and considered as authorities by their fellow-men.

To begin with, however, it is needful that Europeans should unite, and if, as we hope, there are enough Europeans in Europe,--in other words, enough persons to whom Europe is no mere geographical term, but something which they have profoundly at heart,--then we mean to attempt to found such a union of Europeans. We ourselves wish only to give the first impulse to such a union; wherefore we ask you, should you be in agreement with us, and, like us, bent upon making the determination of Europe as widely known as possible, to send us your signature."[9]

Albert Einstein wrote to Paul Ehrenfest on 22 March 1919, and summarized the jews' objectives in instigating the two world wars,

"[The Allied Powers] whose victory during the war I had felt would be by far the lesser evil are now proving to be only slightly the lesser evil. [***] I get most joy from the emergence of the Jewish state in Palestine. It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun 'bandits.'"[10]

Georg Nicolai believed that the Chinese and other mongoloids are superior to Europeans and will be justified in exterminating Europeans in a race war of extermination. Nicolai (Lewinstein) wrote in 1917,

"§ 34.--What a War of Extermination Means

Thus to-day the original conception of war is distorted until it has become completely reversed, simply because there is no longer anything natural about war; it is now merely a romantic reminiscence. Now, it might be, and has been said, that the benefits of war come afterward. It might be thought, however, that any one thus contemplating the remote effects of war ought seriously to reflect upon its inevitable results. That is, he ought to think out his ideas to their logical conclusions, which seems easy, but is often very difficult.

The idea of war as a factor likely to favor the selection of the fittest, and thus promote human evolution, is simple enough. War is here looked upon as representing that relentless, or rather that disinterested, justice which allows the fit to survive and destroys the unfit. Those who consider this right should act accordingly, and proceed to draw up rules accordingly. They ought to adopt the usages of war of which we read in ancient history, rules by which old men were killed and also unborn children, but not the seemingly humane (!) rules of modern times--rules which make war a farce in the sense in which a natural scientist uses the word; that is to say, cause it to promote negative selection, and thus convert it into a means of deterioration

The gulf which apparently separates the selfish human being of to-day from the humane promoter of civilization is merely apparent; and here I would recall what I have already said about struggle between animals and struggle between man and man. Both are justifiable in themselves and both can be carried on logically. Difficulties do not arise until we begin to imagine that it is allowable to carry on an animal struggle against human beings and by human methods. This is senseless, and therefore criminal; for war as waged at present can be considered only a justifiable form of struggle for existence if the nations against whom we are waging war are not looked upon as human beings, at any rate not as human beings on a level with ourselves; that is, if it is desired to carry on a war of extermination against barbarians so as to enable true humanity to find room upon and spread over the earth. No European will feel that he is justified in considering another European as a barbarian. The utmost which might be asked is whether we are not entitled to consider ourselves a superior race in comparison with certain undeveloped races, such as the Andamans or Tierra del Fuegans. What will undoubtedly occur is that these people will gradually be exterminated by the white race, though it has long been clear that it would be extremely foolish to make war upon them. They die out of themselves wherever they come in contact with whites, bloodless warfare being always more effectual than bloody.

There is only one race for which this question of racial superiority might be profoundly important--the Mongolian. I do not know who are the superior, the Mongolians or we ourselves, but I can quite understand our looking on the Mongolian race as enemies, and that, for instance, Europeans on the highest plane would not easily be induced to have a child by a Mongolian woman, at any rate not to own it. I can therefore also fully understand that we or the Mongolians might say, 'Only one of us two races can rule over the world, and we want that race to be ours.'

In this case the biologically weaker race--that is, the one which may rest assured that in ordinary course it would fall a victim to natural selection--might perhaps be justified in saying, 'As there is no chance of our getting the upper hand by natural and lawful means, we will try to take by force what nature withholds from us.' This shows very plainly that for the really strong war is superfluous; and as obviously it is generally folly for the weak, it is self-evident that, save in the rarest instances, there can be no possible object whatever in it.

Now, it is possible that one such rare instance may be afforded by the Mongolians, for, unlike all the other colored races, they seem to be in certain respects fitter than Europeans, although it is impossible to know exactly how they will be affected when once they are drawn into the vortex of modern civilization. Meantime, however, the sons of Heaven have the enormous advantage of being able to work equally well under all heavens, whether in the icy wastes of the tundras or under the burning sun of Sumatra. Apparently this is a special Mongolian peculiarity, for even primitive Teutonic peoples simply melted away under the Southern sun to which their impulse led them, and negro races get consumption if transferred to colder climates.

If all this is really the case, then the greater part of the habitable world belongs to the Mongols, and likewise the overlordship thereof; for it seems out of the question, seeing how much going to and fro there already is and how much more there is certain to be in the near future, that two races should live side by side and yet apart. They will mix, and one will prevail over the other.

But perhaps even the most humane of us all would not desire this, and therefore I can imagine our pointing with pardonable pride to our civilization, and saying that we are ready to take up arms in defense of it. You Mongols may be better than we are, we would say, but you are different. We do not want to know anything about your civilization, even supposing it to be superior; we mean to keep our own. From this point of view I can imagine a war, but then it must be really a relentless, merciless war

There are now in the world five hundred millions of us Europeans or white men originally from Europe, and a thousand millions of various colored races. I believe we have even now the technical means at our disposal for exterminating these thousand millions in the course of the next twenty years. After twenty years, however, we shall no longer be in a position to do this, as soon, that is, as China has armed her whole population, constructs her own dreadnoughts, and manufactures her own cannon and shells, as Japan is already doing.

In the ensuing twenty years, therefore, it is possible that the fate of the world will be decided once and for all, and the responsibility for this decision rests with the five hundred millions of Europeans. The Mongolians need do nothing but wait, for time and space are on their side.

At a time when the fate of so many men is hanging in the balance, Europeans may, perhaps must, be asked whether on careful consideration they mean to declare all colored races barbarians, and then begin a struggle for existence, in other, words a war of extermination, and not a ridiculous war for power, against everything non-European. When once so terrible a conception as that of such a war is grasped, then, if anything save senseless cruelty is to be the result, it also must be thought out to the end, and there would have to be a war sans trève et sans relâche

We must not spare even the child in its mother's womb, and must tolerate no bastards. Such a war would be ghastly, but there would be some object in it. It is useless to talk of the justice of a war, but in a sense this ghastliest of wars is the justest because, at any rate, 'it serves its own particular purpose.'

To me it seems at least conceivable that some such war might succeed, although I certainly do not believe this. History, indeed, proves over and over that the despair of nations fighting for their lives gives rise to strength which enables them to triumph over all technical expedients. Here, again, any attempt to interfere with the justice of history by such brutal methods might only too easily hasten the downfall of Europe. European nations, as I think, would do better to concentrate all their economic, technical, and scientific resources on increasing their internal vital energy, that is, on promoting race hygiene in every respect, and thus endeavor to become the equals and even the superiors of the Mongols

This opens up vistas of victories not purchased with blood--victories which I am profoundly convinced are within the bounds of possibility. This inextinguishable hope is due to my proud European racial instinct. I will not, and I refuse to, admit that the Mongols have in the long run greater vitality than I. I trust that the majority of Europeans think as I do, and that never shall we show the Asiatics such a sign of weakness as to draw the sword against them. Even if the European nations were faint-hearted, even if they were doubtful of ultimate peaceful victory, and if nothing seemed to stand in the way of their extermination by force, even, then I would shrink from resort to force, and I am convinced that the majority of mankind agree with me.

Every one, however, must compound with his own conscience, and should any one be anxious to proceed to victory by way of force, I will go a step further to please him. I feel that all Europeans belong to the same race, and I am proud of this. But others certainly feel this less keenly than I do, and they let their wholesome race instinct run to waste in all manner of fantastic and useless notions, such as the supposed existence of a Teutonic race.[Footnote: Cf. §§ 90-105, about race patriotism.

But there are those who believe in the Teutons, Germans, or Prussians having a right to predominate. I shall not here discuss the justification for such ideas, but those who would fain lead such small aggregates of human beings to victory must at any rate ask themselves whether they are able and, if able, also willing, to fight out this fight in the only way in which it can answer its purpose

As for Teutonism, the question is as follows: take the one hundred million Germans or, properly speaking, the twenty millions more or less pure Teutons living in various parts of Europe, most of whom will have nothing whatever to do with the conception of Teutonism. Do they believe that they can with any prospect of success embark upon a struggle against forces from fifteen to a hundred times more numerous, and do they really mean to destroy these? If they have made up their minds to this, then let them make the attempt, and they will be fighting for an idea, and for an object which is at least conceivable

We are therefore faced with the following alternative: we must either resolve to live in peace with the French, Russians, English, and whatever all their names may be, or we must wage a war of extermination upon them, a war whose purpose it is not to leave one of them alive

Whoever, therefore, decides for war is, at any rate, no fool, and has logic on his side. Nevertheless, I hope and believe that even those who most delight in war will incline toward peace when once they realize what is the inevitable alternative. But this senseless playing at war which is now devastating Europe must be the last of its kind."[11]

Soon after Georg Friedrich Nicolai issued his call for a European Union, and stated that the mongols will be justified in exterminating the White Race, Freemason Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi made his pitch, sponsored by the jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg, for the European Union in the hopes of breeding out the White Race through miscegenation with Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians. Coudenhove-Kalergi maintained that the jews were the master race and it was necessary to destroy the White Race to make room for jewish World rule, as I explained in my recent article, The Jewish Genocide of Europe: Kaganovich, Yagoda, Ehrenburg and Coudenhove-Kalergi

I go into Albert Einstein's genocidal anti-European racism in far greater depth in my books Mileva Einstein-Marity Einstein's Partner in Crime and ALBERT EINSTEIN The Incorrigible RACIST.

--------------------

1). G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), p. 531.

2). A. Einstein to Ilse Einstein, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 536, Princeton University Press, (1998); and Ilse Einstein to Georg Nikolai, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 545, Princeton University Press, (1998). A. Calaprice, D. Kennefick, R. Schulmann, "Georg Nicolai", An Einstein Encyclopedia, Princeton University Press, (2015), pp.73-74. D. Overbye, "Einstein, Confused in Love and, Sometimes, Physics", The New York Times, (31 August 1999). D. Overbye, Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, Viking, New York, (2000), pp. 343, 404, note 22.

3). A. Einstein, English translation by I. Born in M. Born, The Born-Einstein Letters, Walker and Company, New York, (1971), p. 8.

4). P. Frank, Einstein: His Life and Times, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, (1947), p. 293.

5). R. Highfield and P. Carter, The Private Lives of Albert Einstein, St. Martin's Press, New York, (1993), p. 148.

6). P. A. Bucky, Einstein, and A. G. Weakland, "Einstein's Roving Eye", The Private Albert Einstein, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City, (1992), pp. 127-135.

7). "Deposition in Divorce Proceedings" English translation by A. M. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 676, Princeton University Press, (1998), p. 713. See also: M. Zackheim, Einstein's Daughter, the Search for Lieserl, Riverhead Books, Penguin Putnam, New York, (1999), pp. 78-79.

8). Ilse Einstein to Georg Nikolai, English translation by A. M. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 545, Princeton University Press, (1998), p. 565. See also: D. Overbye, Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, Viking, New York, (2000), pp. 343, 404, note 22. See also: A. Einstein to Ilse Einstein, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 536, Princeton University Press, (1998).

9).G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), pp. xvii-xix.

10). Letter from A. Einstein to P. Ehrenfest of 22 March 1919, English translation by A. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 9, Document 10, Princeton Univsersity Press, (2004), pp. 9-10, at 10.

11). G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), pp. 84-89.